Mary Cummins, Mary, Cummins-Cobb, Cobb, Los Angeles, California, Animal Advocates, Cummins Real Estate Services, lawsuit

Filings, motions, evidence, exhibits in Mary Cummins, Bat World Sanctuary, Amanda Lollar lawsuit.

Cause no. 352-248169-10 filed in the 352nd Judicial District of Tarrant County, Texas. Judge Bonnie Sudderth over saw the case. Judge William Brigham presided over the trial. Judge Jeffrey Walker presided over the motion to recuse. Plaintiff is represented by Attorney Randall aka Randy Turner with Bailey & Galyen in Bedford, Texas. Defendant Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates in Los Angeles, California is pro se. Appeal filed in Second Court of Appeals in Texas Case # 02-12-00285-CV.

I am posting information about the appeal here.

This page has been posted in response to libel and defamation posted by Amanda Lollar, Bat World Sanctuary. They are making libelous and defamatory untrue statements about me. This page is here to post the facts and truth about this lawsuit. I reported Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary for animal cruelty and neglect. In retaliation she sued me for defamation. On top of this she defamed and libeled me. I was forced to sue her in California Federal court. More info on the Mary Cummins vs Amanda Lollar, Bat World Sanctuary and John Does is here. I was also injured while at Bat World Sanctuary. I had to file a personal injury claim against Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary which is here.

Court docket for case 352-248169-10 - 206 filings

The bottom half of this page keeps going missing so I made a copy of this page up to May 11, 2012 here. I don't know if they are hacking it down or if the page is just too big.

Here is a link to a page where I have posted some of the fair and honest reports I made to authorities about Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary. The Judge ruled that these were not defamation but fair and honest reports. Here they are.I will be posting reports that government agencies, City Council members, member of the Historical Society, her neighbors, members of the public and bat experts have made against her next.

April 24, 2013: Why Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary no longer have a USDA permit.

May 5, 2011. A USDA veterinarian writes a report about Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary. This is why Amanda Lollar no longer has a USDA permit.

"Hi All, I wanted to include another line about suffering in my previous analysis of this procedure. I have reviewed the U-Tube footage and looked at the complaint about the bat that was mishandled by Ms. Amanda Lollar of the Bat World Sanctuary. This is indeed a violation of the AWA. Ms. Lollar should have sought veterinary assistance for the bat with the dystocia. It would be one thing if she were only assisting a birth, but the moment Ms. Lollar realized this was a dystocia requiring an episiotomy, she should have taken the bat to her attending vet or a local veterinarian. Apologizing in the video to the bat does not solve the problem. This mother bat clearly experienced pain and suffering at Ms. Lollar's hand, so much so t hat it appeared to lose consciousness during the procedure No anesthesia was given to the bat and no pain management was offered. I believe the mother bat could have survived if it had been properly anesthetized and the pup delivered using proper surgical techniques. It is possible the pup could also have survived if this case had been properly managed by a veterinarian. USDA veterinarian."

Another complaint comes in. Her inspector tells USDA that Amanda is "Not happy with us and very glad to be rid of us." The complaint comes in "Bat World dropped their license. We can't do anything to them. Darn."

Even after she lost her USDA permit she still posts that she has a USDA permit.

Amanda Lollar is pissed at the USDA and decides to start reporting people with USDA permits. She filed a false complaint about a USDA exhibitor to USDA. No violations were found. From the USDA inspector.

April 19, 2013: Amanda Lollar aka Rachel was upset that I outed her to her lawyers. I'm sure she's denying it even though the evidence is as clear as can be and independently verified. She made more blog posts about me further confirming that she is those posters. She's been emailing her attorney Randy Turner about this today back and forth a few times. Amanda emails him at night. He of course reads her email at 8:00 pm while he's at home.

Hypocrisy. Amanda Lollar added to her position statement today on research. She thinks animal research, bat research is fine. From her position statement:

Additionally, researchers working with animals in any setting are charged by the Animal Welfare Act with providing appropriate, humane care for the animals with which they work, and are held to a high ethical standard in promoting the responsible use of animals in research. Accordingly, it is Bat World Sanctuary’s position that any bats used in field or laboratory research must be surrendered to a qualified, permitted/licensed rehabilitation or sanctuary facility upon conclusion of the research, to be released back to their natural habitat or, in cases where this is not possible, to be afforded permanent sanctuary and care for the remainder of their lives.

One, she states researchers must abide by the Animal Welfare Act because they have USDA permits. Funny, she doesn't have a USDA permit because she doesn't want to abide by the act. Two, animal activists are against ALL animal research. Here she is for research. She just doesn't think they should be killed at the end of the research. That's the point of research. You do something to an animal, kill it, examine it and see if what you did altered the animal. She just wants researchers to give her the bats when they're done so she can "rescue" it. Do they not realize that Amanda Lollar then experiments on these bats and she's not a doctor and doesn't even have a USDA permit! Fortunately no researcher or the USDA would ever listen to Amanda Lollar's advice.

April 13, 2013: Amanda Lollar aka Rachel Thompson also has a youtube and google account. She stated she went to Beverly Hills High School when she didn't go past the ninth grade. She did not go to my high school. In these user names she would attack me on youtube and google. She would also sing her own praises and lie. I saved print outs of all of her nasty posts and profiles. Amanda Lollar is 55 years old and is doing these juvenile things. She always pretends to be younger, educated and to live in Los Angeles or Beverly Hills. Why is that? Below is more of her crazy emails and posts which she made. Board of Directors of Bat World really need to vote her off the board. How embarrassing for the President of the group to be acting like this.

These are a few of her user names, Rachel Thompson, Venus De Magio, Venus Poplartree, Posie Peartree. Below are a few of her childish comments which she made about me. And she does it "anonymously."

Isn't it sad when all someone does it talk about their cats?

Is that your only friend? Does she have cats too? LOL!

I'm reporting your channel. You just can't shut the hell up, even when you lose, lose, lose.

Yes, and he dies because he was full of worms, right? And you thought he had MBD when he was loaded with worms. right? Poor baby, died from being misdiagnosed. Too bad he didn't go to someone who could have saved him. I heard it took him weeks to finally die.

There is something wrong with posting videos about vomit. Sick!

Hey aren't all the videos of bats the ones you took at Bat World Sanctuary, where you claim the bats were being mistreated? It's odd that you are showing videos of healthy, well cared for bats at the batworld when you falsely reported them for animal cruelty, then you got sued and were ordered to pay 6 million in damages and you were found to be malicious and they were compared to Jane Goodall. I am surprised that you are showing these well-cared for bats as it proves batworld's case.

I am glad he lived. Is it true that most of the animals in your care are stressed so bad they die? I have seen your videos of the babies that look like they are being choked and squeezed really hard and wondered if maybe that was the reason.

Didn't you just lose a defamation lawsuit for posting this crap about a well respected rescue?

Do these people know that you were served at this event for the 6 million judgement against you for defamation you posted all over the internet about a nonprofit organization?

Hey, are you obsessed with vomit and poop? Oh, and insertional worms too? You seem to post about that stuff on your FB page a lot. Well, that, and your crotch and suing people.

Why not tell people that you lost a defamation lawsuit and have to pay another nonprofit 6.1 million in damages for the lies you posted about them all over the internet. Just a suggestion :)

These are from her "anonymous" emails

Why on earth would you need my banking information?! This is VERY SUSPICIOUS! You never even bothered to answer my questions, instead you attack me after I donated to your org?! This makes me feel that everything I am reading about you is true! I am going to alert my friends about your response to me. Not cool, not cool AT ALL!

You are sorely mistaken. I most certainly did.If this is the manner in which you treat your donors, then NO WONDER your organization is failing so badly.

How do you know I didn't donate? I never even gave you my full name!  I am posting this exact conversation on every review I can find. This is a disgrace.Do not respond. I am blocking your address.

OMG-WHAT HAPPENED?! Hey, are you going to post the final judgment for the world to see your big victory?  “I always represent myself and I always win.”  LMAO!!!!!!!!!!! Darn all these state and federal judges in Texas and California who are incompetent, biased, and don’t understand the law!   I guess they’re just as stupid as all those government agencies that investigated Amanda Lollar and Bat Word (because of your complaints) and found that your allegations were baseless and false. What’s a nutcase to do?  ROTFLMAO!!!!!!

Whoa - is that a threat?

I just wanted to say that I love, love, love that new video/photo of you showing up in Google! it's awesome! The video of you holding the balloons is brilliant, very well done, two thumbs up!!! I'm sharing it with everyone. All the best. Rachel

Mary Cummins lost her ass to Randy Turner to the tune of 6.1 Million and all she can do is come up with pages like this? Proves what a sore loser she is, she'd be better off going away quietly and crawling under a rock. Mary, don't you realize all this crap makes the world hate you even more? Give it up already!

I then asked her who she was. She said "I am mother." She then replied with "Lol, who said I was YOUR mother? Besides, your mother is NOT dead. Nice try, lol

I believe Amanda Lollar has some deep seated mental issues to send me these emails and make these comments online. She should know I can easily trace her.

April 12, 2013: For the last year or so Amanda Lollar has been sending me threatening, disturbing, juvenile emails thinking she was anonymous. She has never been anonymous. Initially she pretended to be a FB friend and wanted to know what was happening with the case. I replied with this "Please, give me your real name and phone number and I will call you. EXCITING THINGS ARE HAPPENING!!! :-D." She did not realize I was being sarcastic and knew it was her. She replied with "Rachel Wilcox. Im in CO and follow you on facebook too. I have a stalker too. I don't give out my number, you can understand why. thanks!" This is Amanda Lollar. She then changes the name but not the email address and tries again. She sent this "Darn all these state and federal judges in Texas and California who are incompetent, biased, and don’t understand the law! I guess they’re just as stupid as all those government agencies that investigated Amanda Lollar and Bat Word (because of your complaints) and found that your allegations were baseless and false. What’s a nutcase to do? ROTFLMAO!!!!!!" She's delusional. TPWD, USDA, Health Dept all found violations. She got a reprimand from Health Dept, TPWD. Her USDA permit was cancelled. She continues to email me.

"I just wanted to say that I love, love, love that new video/photo of you showing up in Google! it's awesome! The video of you holding the balloons is brilliant, very well done, two thumbs up!!!I'm sharing it with everyone.All the best.Rachel"

This is the video of her paid thug hitting me with papers while pretending to serve me. She brags about a video of a crime being committed. Disturbing but it doesn't stop there. I emailed "Who are you?" She replies with "I am mother." She is totally crazy but still doesn't stop. She next pretends that she donated to my group. She did not and I tell her this. She responds, "How do you know I didn't donate? I never even gave you my full name! I am posting this exact conversation on every review I can find. This is a disgrace. Do not respond. I am blocking your address." I responded and she did not block me. She continued to email. Krog, Dmytryk and Lollar all doing the same "anonymous" harassing email crap. I believe they are mentally ill.

April 10, 2013: I will be loading up some videos from the depositions this week. Here are some stills. This is Sara Kennedy in New York. She also did not go to college. She has no wildlife rehabilitation permit. Her only experience with bats was at Bat World Sanctuary. This is her website here. She used to work at Michael's Arts and Crafts. This woman was and still is attacking me online. She also likes to make negative comments about my looks on youtube, devianart, facebook. I have never called these people fat, ugly, old, wrinkly or bald yet they like to call me that. Very childish indeed.

April 2, 2013: I filed my appeal brief yesterday. I will post it as soon as the clerk confirms it. I should win the appeal based on the law and evidence. In the meantime Lollar has been sending around the court order to various websites trying to get my blogs, posts taken down. The sites forward the items to me and don't remove anything. I also got Amanda Lollar's video of her hired thug pretending to serve me a legal document removed from YouTube. I believe she realizes she will lose the appeal and look horrible in the process.

I had to read through the trial minutes to write my appeal. In the trial Amanda Lollar states that she wanted me and everyone to share the information and data with the world. Obviously if I were to then share the information that can never be breach of contract for sharing data. She also admitted that my photos and videos did not share any proprietary or copyrighted information. They were not defamation. Her attorney also said that Exhibit 19 which were my reports to the government were not defamation. Then items taken from those reports and posted online are also not defamation. In trial she also admitted there were no damages and no proof of causation.

I was going through her 1998 manual. In her manual she clearly states that you must sedate a bat before removing their teeth. She did not sedate the bat in the video. The bat was kicking and biting her. This will be a very interesting appeal.

March 3, 2013: More information coming in. Here is a previous email about the WNS symposium. More info. Carrie McLaughlin sent the symposium invitation to TPWD, Bat Experts, Urban Biologists, people in her Google group. It reached TPWD who took immediate action. Amanda Lollar stated on her website that Bat World is the ONLY group helping bats with WNS. Not only is that not true, but they are not allowed to even tough bats with WNS. The information Amanda Lollar wrote in the invitation to the event was also incorrect. Amanda Lollar has not gone past the ninth grade. She does not know what she's talking about in regard to WNS. Finally experts and authorities are realizing what Bat World is all about. I found the original invitation here. The symposium was cancelled. All references were deleted from Bat World and BRITs site though you can see some references online in Google groups.

February 28, 2013: Breaking news! Amanda Lollar is told by Texas Parks & Wildlife Department she cannot have an assurance colony. They also state her educational bats don't appear to have been approved on a case by case basis and she does not have an exhibit permit. She is not allowed to exhibit bats. Pretty crazy for Amanda Lollar to want to do a WNS symposium when she hasn't gone past the ninth grade and has no degrees. She even invited true experts who would most certainly call her out on this. In the brochure for the event posted August 2012 Amanda Lollar states she has a USDA permit! It was cancelled March 2012. The event never took place because TPWD seems to have stopped it.

TPWD is also concerned about the Bat Castle. Bat World has no permit to put bats in that building. They also have no permit or permission to move bats to that building. Amanda Lollar has not even told them about the Bat Castle. TPWD also said that she would have to release all bats at her current building. Move to the new building then she can take in new bats.She cannot move the bats to a new building as you can only have one address per permit.

Lollar requested that TPWD write this statement saying "Texas Parks and Wildlife investigated Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary, saw no evidence to back up the accusations, and found the complaints to be without merit." TPWD wrote back "according to one of our game wardens, there is no current active investigation." TPWD never wrote the statement that Amanda Lollar asked them to write. This is the statement which she's since stated as fact. She lied.

This is what really happened with the investigation. They did not fully investigate because they didn't have the time. "When I responded to Mary Cummins' open records request/complaints about Ms Lollar back in May, I told her that there were no final investigation results at that time, and that staff would investigate as time and resources allowed in the future. However, Karen Pianka had said that she didn't have time to do much, if any, more investigating, so the investigation has been unofficially closed." TPWD wants to limit the number of bats she can have. "I see that Lollar's current permit authorizes her to retain unlimited quantities of non-releasable bats for educational purposes. Shouldn't we limit the quantity?"

Amanda Lollar also told a TPWD agent that she has an "assurance colony of free-tail bats." Free tail bats can't get WNS. She is not allowed to have an assurance colony. Amanda Lollar is not abiding by the regulations. TPWD also specifically states she is not allowed to let the bats breed. Lollar of course brags that she has the only "captive breeding colony" of bats.

All of this means that Amanda Lollar's "educational bats" were not approved. She cannot have an assurance colony. She cannot exhibit bats. In her website Lollar is raising funds to build an assurance colony that she is not allowed to have. Not very honest.

Amanda Lollar is now attacking the group that was going to give her a donation. They excluded their "celeb" who is a totally unknown person and Amanda is mad. Does she really think Patty Lotz is a celeb and O'Barry is not? Clueless. Amanda's now encouraging people to delete their accounts. She even wrote a nasty email which she publicly posted sharing everyone's email address:

"From: Bat World Sanctuary sanctuary@batworld.org To: Sheri Landry slandry@thebille.com Cc: Ricki Bush ricki.bush@juno.com; Patty Lotz powermouthy@yahoo.com; Dottie BWlonestar@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:00 AM Subject: Re: Was our charity removed?

Sheri,

BiLLe has caused me great embarrassment. Your own rules state that you would notify the super-fan of their celebrity being removed BEFORE the contest started. You waited until AFTER our celebrity had received votes and was in first place, and then suddenly deleted our listing

That was a deceitful thing to do, and is also against your own rules. Also, it appears BiLLe contrived to have us removed by deliberately creating criteria in which we would not fit. At this point I do not believe that *any* celeb we tried to re-enter with would be accepted by BiLLe, because BiLle does not follow its own rules.

Patty Lotz has been in the soap opera Loving, the movie Careful What You Wish For, the movie Swing Vote, the movie Body Double, tv series Silk Stockings, Moonlighting, and Matt Houston. She was a Veejay on VH-1 and she is a radio celebrity with her own show called Power Mouth Patty. Ric O'Barry has not been in involved in anything since the 1960s, yet he remains in your contest.

I am very disappointed as I thought BiLLe was a great contest, fair and trustworthy. Obviously I was mistaken.

Amanda

February 26, 2013: Thug Robert Henry Young posted video of him supposedly serving me with documents. He posted part of it. Why doesn't he post the entire video? Because he doesn't want people to see what he actually did. He also never posted the full unedited video of the first time he supposedly served me. His video guy zoomed into me when he came towards me. Why not post the entire video? What are they hiding?

I'd just posted moments earlier that what Amanda Lollar is doing is getting close to the RICO level. Amanda Lollar confirms that she is using her Facebook fans like an "army." Everything which was posted was 100% the truth yet she calls it "defamation" so her army will attack people and report the truth to get it deleted. If she keeps up with all of her nasty tricks, one might consider doing the same.

"AMAZING, That's what bat peeps are. We have an army in you - you've made that crystal clear today. We can't thank you enough for going to "bat" for us in such an inspiring way. It is hard enough to promote a maligned species, but fighting malicious defamation on top of that makes it harder still. The bottom line is that when people believe horrible lies about us, they won't turn to us when they find a bat in need. Your coming to our defense today was not only a tremendous help to us, you are saves lives in the process. For that we cannot thank you enough. We love you, Bat Peeps."

I filed a police report against the person Amanda Lollar hired to pretend to serve me with papers. I called the FBI to file a report but they told me it's not their jurisdiction. They told me to file the report with local police. I just filed a police report in Texas because Amanda Lollar ordered and paid the guy to do that. I will follow up on these reports. I also reported the guy's private investigator license. Robert Young thinks he's above the law doing whatever he wants, harassing people, threatening them. Amanda Lollar also thinks she can do whatever the hell she likes just because she's been getting away with it.

Amanda Lollar via her Facebook user account Bat World Sanctuary and her husband Larry Crittenden, John Hyatt and others were attacking me all morning on Facebook. Someone else posted a link to an article about her animal cruelty and of course I get attacked for it. Amanda Lollar told her 37,000 "fans" to attack me and also to attack other peoples' pages. I saved those posts. This is becoming a RICO issue. Larry Crittenden posted that the animal cruelty report was a "hoax." No, it wasn't. I filed fair reports. Judge did not rule them to be defamation. Someone else posted that I said that my attorney made sexual advances to me. I never said that and he never did that. I will be adding these things to my new harassment lawsuit.

Just a reminder that Amanda Lollar sent an email to the City saying she's sick of all of the complaints about her. Instead of taking care of the problems such as the smell or guano, she's leaving town. Her own words ""I can no longer run a world class organization with the constant distractions of having to defend our work protecting the environment and the bats. The burden has just become too overwhelming." Link to her email. Also included is email between her neighbor who's been complaining about her for many years to the City Manager talking about her building being gutted. She sold the building January 2012 which is why she's begging for money to build a new building. She has no wild sanctuary building.

February 25, 2013: I don't know why I write these dates because I'm not actually posting all of the material on these dates. Within the last couple of days Amanda Lollar posted to her blogs devoted solely to me the same material she presumably posted on indybay. She claims I'm stalking her. She notes dates that I'm stalking her. One, you can clearly tell it's reversed. She keeps trying to subscribe to my pages and I have to block her. She keeps emailing me under supposedly anonymous names. She made new domain names and new blog names devoted ONLY to me. I have not made a new domain or blog devoted to her. I post about her in my website here or my existing blogs. She bought about 30 new domains with hosting services to attack me with bat world money. She follows my every move. She even hired a guy to follow me, harass me, batter me and videotape it for her. I bet she gets off on the videos. Who is stalking whom?

February 24, 2013: Today at 7:00 a.m. CA time it looks like Amanda Lollar posted a still from the video of me being assaulted last Sunday. There is a time/date stamp on the still. 02-17 09:26:38. That is when he was there. In the still I'm looking at the guy while his video guy videos. I can tell from where she took the still it's the same process serve. This proves she ordered the guy to pretend to serve me so he could assault me. I believe Amanda Lollar is seriously mentally ill. She ordered the hit from Texas so it's time to call the FBI.

Here is the guy's face.

He posted pics of his wife, daughter, grandson, family in the same directory as his work photos. These photos are public. I blurred out his wife and grandson. This photo is for the police and my neighbors. I've now given them a full description of this guy.

February 22, 2013: Just got back from my mail box. Appellees wanted to send the original exhibits of Plaintiffs to the Appeals court. I agreed with this. Why waste paper, time and energy. Judge Bonnie Sudderth signed the order. This is puzzling. Judge Jeffrey Walker in his order stated that Judge William Brigham is in charge of everything in regard to this case from the trial on out. That is why I could not recuse him and Judge Bonnie could not hear the other motions. I did an info act request to Judge Jeffrey's office to get a copy of his order in regard to Brigham. If Brigham is supposed to be in charge of this case to the very end, why did Judge Bonnie Sudderth sign this order? Obviously just a rhetorical question as the court has not been honest or straight forward with me about quite a few things. They do as they please no matter what.

At the Mayoral convention last week I was speaking with a lawyer about dishonest, unfair, incompetent and lazy Judges. She said it happens here in California especially in smaller cities like Palm Springs, Riverside or in Courts where the Judge has to read all the documents and write all the orders himself. I can only say that I was extremely lucky to have had kind and fair judges in my Philadelphia and New York cases. I didn't realize how rare that was until this case. Thank you Judge Flora Wolf and Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for being fair, kind and just. If only there were more judges like those women.

February 20, 2013: The police asked if I had a description of the guy who threw the documents at me. I even have a photo. I'm 5'8" so he's 5" taller than me and is 6'2", heavy set, white guy with lighter colored hair born March 10, 1965, 48 years old. Why a guy bigger than me would hit me with documents is really beyond me. I'm sure Amanda Lollar had to pay extra for that. Amazing she's wasting Bat World Sanctuary's funds on hiring a guy to assault me half way across the country. A sick individual. Never would I have ever thought of doing something like this to her.

February 19, 2013: The thug Amanda Lollar hired is named Robert Henry Young, a licensed private investigator (License 23001) and process server (License 1911?) born March 10, 1965. I had to gather this information for the police report. You would think he would know the law. He lives in Anaheim at 4107 E Alderdale Ave, Anaheim, CA 92807. He was able to retain this house even after he and his wife went bankrupt in 2000. Their social security numbers are listed on their bankruptcy docs. Seems he was sued for violating someone's civil rights, also had a little run in with the law. Amanda Lollar seems to find some real low lifes, first Randy Turner then Eric Shupps and now Robert Young. I wonder how much of Bat World money did Amanda Lollar pay to the guy to harass and assault me? Her board of directors is liable for her behavior as they voted her president. They have the power to vote her out completely if they like. That is what California Wildlife Center did to Amanda's friend Rebecca Dmytryk when she was destroying the group and causing volunteers to leave.

February 18, 2013: Yesterday I believe Amanda Lollar hired some thug to pretend to serve me a legal document at the Mayoral convention. Instead of handing me the documents or dropping it on the ground which would be legal service, he threw the folded document at me with force hitting me with it. I just looked more closely at the document. It's the sister state filing from 11/09/12. They did not serve it within 60 days. That means they have to refile and reserve me. This is not legal service as this document is void. I bet Amanda Lollar did this just to harass me. I just asked Hotel security to save their security video for the police. This shows you how low petty, juvenile, nasty Amanda Lollar will go just to be mean.

Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary is still harassing me and now has directed her fans to attack my website host. I have copied all of her posts. The judge ruled that everything in this website today is not defamation. Everything in the order was removed even though that also was not defamation. She is upset that her USDA permit was cancelled. She's probably also upset that Texas Parks & Wildlife wrote that they are considering limiting the number of bats she has.

February 16, 2013: Bat World's USDA permit has been cancelled. Here is a pic. I am sending in a FOIA request to find out why. She needs a USDA permit to house all of those bats. Perhaps she lost it because she is way over the density limit for bats. She's even over her own density limit which she sets for other people! Plus, her enclosure is not tall enough for the large flying fox. It can't fly. USDA permit cancelled This is probably why she is attacking a person with a USDA permit who has a perfect record. She is jealous. Probably why she attacks me as well. I have a perfect USDA record.

February 8, 2013: Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary is still defaming and attacking a wildlife educator. A fully licensed wildlife educator has a bat named Echo. She legally received the bat weaned, it can fly and has a flight cage where it flies. The woman knows how to care for bats. Amanda Lollar is defaming the woman by stating it was not weaned, lives in a tiny cage, cannot fly and the woman doesn't know how to care for it. Amanda Lollar is asking Bat World's Facebook fans (which she bought with advertising) to sign a petition to the USDA to remove the bat from this woman.

Amanda Lollar quotes this supposed violation "Lisa Limbert is currently in violation of USDA regulations Subpart F: "Species that fly must be provided with sufficient unobstructed enclosure volume to enable movement by flying and sufficient roosting space to allow all individuals to rest simultaneously."

This of course is not the truth. The bat is in a flight cage and can fly. Lollar on the other hand has the largest flying fox. This bat needs at least a 13' tall enclosure so it can fly. Bat World's enclosure is maybe 6'. This bat cannot fly. Lollar is the one not giving proper care. Plus, TPWD stated in writing that they fear Lollar has too many bats and they are going to limit the number of bats she can have.

Fortunately USDA knows what's really happening here. They will not take Echo from the person giving it proper care. Lord only knows if Lollar took that bat it could end up dead under her desk like the one I found when I was at Bat World. Lollar has way too many bats to not notice a bat that had been dead under her desk for days. She even told me it was one of her favorites. Something is obviously very wrong with Lollar. I personally feel she doesn't care about bats. She only cares about her ego and money. She has a huge chip on her shoulder because she's uneducated and true bat experts call her a joke.

February 1, 2013: Amanda Lollar started an online petition to try to get a bat taken away from a duly licensed individual who is giving the bat great care. With all the other bats in the world that need saving, why is she trying to take a bat out of a good home? Beyond me. Thanks to say her online petition has done nothing. USDA, F&W did not investigate because they know the person gives their animals proper care. Oddly enough USDA and TPWD did investigate Amanda Lollar and Bat World. What does that tell you?

January 13, 2013: Amanda Lollar has been entering online contests and begging people to vote for Bat World. No problem there. I'm glad she's making money so she can pay me for damages. In her pleas for votes she attacks the competition. The competition is other charities for children, animals and the environment. "O.M.G. This is crazy - we are small potatoes compared to Jimmy Kimmel, and he could easily give $50,000 of his own money to his charity. We don't even get paid, and volunteer 16 to 18 hours a day, and have worked so hard to win this money for the bats. PLEASE DON"T LET JIMMY WIN! Donate here before 11:59 est:." She is getting fans to hate monger against the charities ahead of her in the contest. Attacking other charities? Amanda Lollar just loves to attack people. Very classless.

January 1, 2013: Someone sent me a link to this video made by the Tarrant County Bar Association Tarrant Tortfeasors. Attorney Randy Turner is in it and obviously approved of this. He's pretending to be the head of the American Bar Association which actually exists. With all the horrible lawyer stereotypes you'd think this is the last thing they'd want to do. I don't find it funny at all. If you look at the channel there are three more tasteless videos which are also not funny at all. With his horrible reputation for being sleazy, nasty, unethical and unprofessional this is the last thing he should be doing.

In other news Randy Turner continues to lie in legal filings. He lied to the Appeals Court telling them the Court wrote the facts and findings. No, they did not. Even though I asked the court to write it, HE wrote it. On top of this he lied and said I did not respond to discovery when I did. I really hope he never becomes a Judge.

December 14, 2012: Randy Turner attorney, animal lover or not? Article about Fort Worth, Texas animal control picking up an injured dog and taking it to a vet for treatment. Animal control must give proper veterinary care to animals they pick up. That's the law. Animal control took the dog to a vet. The bill ended up being $2,000 or so. Dog didn't have an owner and was friendly. City decided to keep the dog as an ambassador. The dog is in City offices in the day time and spends the night at an employee's home. I guess they could have adopted it out if someone wanted it. They still would have been out the $2,000 no matter what. Because the dog is now an ambassador it's getting media attention. People wrote in comments on the article. This is Randy Turner's comment below.

"Randy Turner, Fort Worth lawyer whose lawsuit against the city on behalf of a family whose dog was mistakenly euthanized will be heard in January by the Texas Supreme Court: "As a huge animal lover, I'm all in favor of spending whatever it takes to maintain an animal in good health. I have to give some thought to the city effectively paying for Brandon Bennett's dog. I don't like that part."

The City would be out the $2,000 no matter if they adopted it to a member of the public or Brandon Bennett. An employee is kind enough to let the dog sleep at his house without being paid for that service. Would Turner prefer that the dog be locked in a room or yard in the City office at night and on the weekends? Why does this upset Randy Turner? Because Brandon Bennett is the person who showed that Mimi the pitbull owned by the fake war veteran which Randy Turner represented was dangerous. This is just Randy Turner being nasty, petty and showing his true colors because Turner lost that lawsuit. How very childish.

December 12, 2012: Again, Amanda Lollar is begging for money to build a new facility. What about the $200K she brought in during 2012? Or the $170,000 she made in 2011? Or the money she got January 2012 from selling the old building? She should have enough money to build a new facility easily. I personally feel she is just saying she needs money to build a sanctuary so she can just get more money for the hell of it. I'll be interesting to see if she's honest in her 990's.

December 6, 2012: Amanda Lollar is begging people for money to build a new bat sanctuary. If she didn't sell the old sanctuary, she wouldn't need to buy a new building. If she'd just cleaned the old building she probably could have stayed there. She admits in her "magazine" that she made over $200,000 last year. Again, proves there were no damages. Also proves that she probably doesn't need money to build a new building. The money she received from sale of the old building should be enough to build the new building. Did she keep the money from the sale of the old building? I can ask questions about finances when I depose her in Texas because she's a defendant. Can't wait to get ahold of the trial minutes. So many great quotes in there besides proof of perjury.

I was talking to a fellow rehabber yesterday about Amanda Lollar's experimental bat surgeries. She admitted in writing that sometimes bat die but maybe she's learned something to help the next bat. My friend told me that during Nazi Germany doctors were doing experiments on Jews and others, generally without anesthesia. They actually thought their experiments might further medical science. They were later tried for "medical torture." My friend thinks that Amanda Lollar thinks she may be furthering medical care of bats. Of course she could not be further from the truth. If you look at how true bat veterinary experts treat bats, night and day. Some info on the Nazi doctors..

December 5, 2012: Bat World Sanctuary just released their income for 2012. Their income is over $200,000. This proves there were no damages. It also proves that she lied in court about her finances. On top of this you can see that she spent a ton of Bat World Sanctuary's money on "internet" items. She lumped them in with the purchase of land and cost to build the "castle."

December 3, 2012: I was told by the court coordinator that now that this case is in appeals, the District court no longer will hear any post trial motions. The judge is refusing to even look at them thereby denying them.

November 30, 2012: More evidence of perjury on the part of Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary. In trial she stated that she's no longer getting old fruit from local markets because of what I said about her. She added that they were putting cigarette butts and trash into the little fruit she received. Today on her facebook page she admitted that she's not getting fruit anymore because of a local ordinance which prohibits stores from giving old fruit to people.

"Bat World Sanctuary Sandra Higgins Hanna - yes, we used to be able to get apples, bananas, ect that were slightly bruised but still perfectly okay for consumption (called 'throw-aways"). Last year a local ordinance came into effect that prohibits grocery stores from giving out throw-aways. We also tried to solicit Walmart after learning that our local store alone throws out of 400 pounds of bananas a week. They refused, stating company policy and liability issues (they even have a padlock on their dumpster). It's such a shame, because every wildlife center across the US could benefit from the food that Walmart throws in the trash. We now get all of our produce wholesale, but it's still very expensive.Once we are established on our new land we plan to plant fig, pear and apple trees. I hope to plant a few smaller trees inside the fruit bat's outdoor flight cage so they can eat fresh fruit right off the branches :)"

The woman has no shame. I bet 95% of what she said during the trial was a total lie. Plus, she admitted that people in Mineral Wells have hated her for years because of the smell and mess of the wild sanctuary. She is also totally lacking in social skills which I believe is another big factor.

November 28, 2012: Amanda Lollar wiki user Batworld and her sock puppet which is her IP address have been banned from posting on Wikipedia because they violated the terms of service. Because she is Bat World she has a conflict of interest and is not allowed to post about herself. Most of the edits were done by Amanda Lollar. She was also told that her user name "Batworld" is also a wiki violation.

An admin wrote this about Bat World, "Delete - Sources are too weak, given the litigation and drama around this organization,[7] relevant to the subject but omitted from the article. The CBS article is a meaningless puff piece and the SF Chronicle article doesn't even mention this Texas organization as far as I noticed (it mentions a different "Bat World" in Virginia). The Stella Luna article mention is trivial and the IRS page doesn't speak to notability. The article about the mating calls does mention the organization more than briefly, but its primary topic is something different. Boing's Wapo article is about the same way. I wouldn't call "Do Bats Drink Blood" a scientific publication, and the actual connection to Bat World of publications it cites is unclear, and Boing's other links other than the Jacobs book seem trivial. That leaves the Jacobs book (the one pretty solid source I see so far) and the 608-word, paywalled Dallas Morning News article that I haven't accessed but which doesn't sound promising from the abstract. We can't write an NPOV article (presenting all points of view that a reader seeking info would find relevant) about this organization without using contentious, BLP-implicated primary sources that we shouldn't bring into the article for obvious reasons. It's not ok to strip that stuff out and pretend that what's left presents everything relevant, generations of wikilawyering notwithstanding. That plus the COI editing by people involved with and opposed to the organization IMHO aren't worth the hassle for a topic of such minor notability. So we should delete the article."

Wikipedia only considers entries based on articles in the media. That's all they care about. They don't research the subjects. For instance they think Amanda Lollar wrote the books that Barbara French actually wrote. They don't realize that Amanda Lollar basically plagiarized what Barbara French wrote. Wiki also doesn't realize that Bat World is run out of Lollar's home. She no longer has the other building because she sold it January 2012. On top of this Bat World is not the biggest bat sanctuary of that type. Memphis zoo has over 400 bats which are non-releasable bats or rescues.

I was just told by someone who knows Amanda Lollar that she is bragging that Bat World has more Facebook friends than Bat Conservation International. That is because Amanda Lollar bought those fans. BCI spends their money helping bats while Amanda Lollar spends thousands buying FB fans, making many ihatemary websites and blogs, sending out ihatemary press releases. She also wasted money adding unnecessary extra security to her website because her web guy told her she needed it because of me. No, she didn't. Her web guy left her website totally open for months. Lollar is also wasting Bat World money on legal fees for Eric Shupps. He helped her make her hate sites.

November 26, 2012: For the last two days Amanda Lollar has been attacking me on Wikipedia. She posted defamation about me June 2012 on the Bat World Sanctuary wiki page. I corrected it yesterday. She then posted even more defamation! I reported her for posting on her own group's page under two user names/IDs which is against the TOS. Then wiki blocked her and me because we mentioned the word "lawsuit." I'm unblocked but she is not. She must get rid of her user name and is not allowed to post on that page ever again.

The page is full of incorrect things. Bat World is not the largest bat sanctuary. The Monfort Bat Sanctuary and rescue has 1.8 - 2.5 million bats. The Memphis zoo has over 400 bats. In fact BCI worked with the Memphis zoo and created the FIRST assurance colony site for bats. Lollar is not the first as she claims. She's also not the largest. Wonder why BCI worked with the Memphis zoo instead of Amanda Lollar? Because they wanted to work with kind, sane, bat experts. Amanda Lollar states Bat World is the ONLY group helping bats with white nose syndrome. One, they aren't helping bat with WNS. Two, many other groups are actually helping bats with WNS. Bats in Mineral Wells, Texas don't even get WNS. Amanda Lollar is living a fantasy life of her own imagination.

November 24, 2012: Today Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary stated that her facility is at the maximum limit. As I reported a few months back Texas Parks & Wildlife Dept stated that they were going to limit the number of bats that she can have. They were concerned that she had too many. She currently has more than her own bat enclosure limits dictate. She stated her dad just died of Parkinson's disease and left her $100,000.She stated she is giving this $100K to Bat World to help build a new facility. Remember she sold the 115 N.E. 1st St property in January 2012. She can no longer use that building for bats. I'm sure this is probably just another story. If she wanted to save some money, perhaps she shouldn't be involved in so many lawsuits. Right now she is using Bat World money to defend Eric Shupps in my defamation case against him. Amanda Lollar is paying extra for her attorney to try to file an anti-SLAPP suit against me. This suit is not a necessary legal reply to my lawsuit. She does not have to pay for Eric Shupps legal bills. Eric Shupps will soon lose anyway because he lied to the attorneys. I'll be filing something soon.

In the meantime Randy Turner texas attorney with Bailey & Galyen lost his motion to reconsider. I also filed an opposition to his becoming the attorney for Bat World in my personal injury case. Here is the motion. And here are the exhibits. I will be reporting him to the Texas State Bar. I will also file a restraining order against Randy Turner if he becomes the attorney of record. There's no way I'm putting up with his crap again. He would pretend to "accidentally" bump into me in the hallway pressing his full body against me.

November 2, 2012: I was talking to a friend today about Amanda Lollar being obsessed with my physical looks. 99% of the posts Amanda Lollar makes about me have to do with my physical looks. She keeps posting that I'm old, fat, wrinkly and bald. She is projecting. In her website in her bio she has a photo of herself from 2003, a nine year old photo. She looks nothing like that. My profile image is a photo taken within the last year. I post photos of what I look like right now, without making, just running errands. SHE is the one who regrets getting older. I've also found that very insecure women will call other women fat, old, ugly, bald, wrinkly, whore... That is exactly what she does to me. On top of this she is even more insecure because she is uneducated and bat experts don't want to have anything to do with her. This is the sad person making these crazy nasty posts about me, Amanda Lollar.

October 29, 2012: I believe Amanda Lollar is posting as DaisyPeachTree on Facebook. This is the same user name that was attacking me on Twitter. She forgets I sent a subpoena to Twitter and Facebook. Anyway, "Daisy" is posting that Amanda is "amazing." Bat World is a "huge" organization doing conversation efforts "worldwide." Amanda Lollar thinks I am "jealous" of her? I would never be jealous of someone who harms animals and people. She claims that she "read" that Amanda has a GED. This is the first that I've posted about her GED. She could not have "read" it any where. Again she lies and states I've been involved in over 20 lawsuits. Untrue. Then she says I feed "rotten meat" to my animals and I let my dog eat "used" tampons. That is beyond insane besides defamatory. I sent a cease and desist to her California attorney. Finally, the attacks have stopped. Amanda Lollar is delusional and a very nasty person.

October 27, 2012: UPDATE: Amanda Lollar has now set up a page in her website for people to report the person with a legal permitted bat in Arizona. Irony? A licensed person with a fruit bat is feeding it properly. She has it in a temporary cage. She takes good care of animals. Amanda believes if the person does not kiss her ass, she is not providing good care for the bat. She instantly attacked the woman. Amanda Lollar who has not gone past the ninth grade who operates on bats who die thinks this woman is being cruel. Crazy.

Amanda Lollar noticed someone called Lisa's Creatures had a fruit bat. Instead of offering kind, supportive, polite advise Amanda Lollar told all her fans to attack the woman. The woman is a licensed wildlife rehabilitator and wildlife educator using the bat to educate people. Amanda Lollar thinks it's cruel that the bat is by itself in a cage. Lollar forgets she kept her first imprisoned bats in a wood cabinet. She forgets she performs surgery on bats when she is not a vet and hasn't gone past the ninth grade. She forgets that she doesn't pin bats' broken wings so they can fly free. Instead she amputates them dooming them to life under her "care." Lollar also forgets she recommended freezing bats to death. When Amanda Lollar first started with bats the true experts offered kind supportive advice. All Lollar does to others now is attack them. This is why people who really know her do not like her. Amanda Lollar lacks basic social skills and is not a nice person at all. This is probably why she dropped out of junior high school.

Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary is posting a link about cyberbullying. Very ironic. Amanda Lollar is posting nasty posts calling me fat, old, ugly, wrinkly, puffy, bald, crazy.... She posted death threats against me. She posted on victimsofmisscummins and the nasty Facebook pages about me. She extorted me over the Internet. Very ironic indeed.

October 15, 2012: My response to the supposed 46 "defamatory" statements from the court order. This is exhibit 3 from my motion to reconsider recusal. I go item by item to prove that the items are not defamatory. This is not a violation of the court order. It's a new public document. This is the basis of my appeal. None of the 46 statements are defamatory or breach of contract. They are either the truth, not about Plaintiff or opinion and not statements of facts. Everything I said I backed up with photos, videos, government documents, Plaintiff's own testimony and Plaintiff's own documents.Exhibit 3 from my motion to reconsider recusal.

October 14, 2012: I was copying more of Amanda Lollar's defamation against me when I realized something. She's probably spent at least $5,000 defaming me on the Internet with her many web sites and such. She is spending Bat World money to do this as she has no income. How do donors feel about someone spending money meant for animals on defaming an animal rescuer? Plus, she will lose my defamation case against her. Bat World will have to pay.

Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary is holding a possibly rabid bat. She stated she thinks it has rabies based on the symptoms she is describing. *NEVER TOUCH A BAT WITH YOUR BARE HANDS.


Below is an old pallid bat. The bat crawled out of her bed while I was feeding other bats. I think the bat was hungry and wanted food. I believe this bat is now dead.


I am posting back all of my bat photos and videos. In Amanda Lollar's initial complaint she stated that my videos and photos shared copyrighted and proprietary data. She stated I have no permission to take or post the photos. She dropped all of those charges in the lawsuit because I showed proof that I had permission. I also showed that they did not share anything copyrighted or proprietary. As the temporary injunction is over and the permanent injunction doesn't mention any videos or photos except the video of her trying to perform an episiotomy, I am posting them all back. Already I'm getting nasty comments from supposedly Amanda Lollar in disguise on my YouTube channel.

Link to blog post with videos

Link to blog post with videos

Here are some of the photos. I'll be posting a lot more.

Amanda Lollar is still spending Bat World Sanctuary money to buy fans. She buys fans. It appears she made a lot of the "positive" reviews on her Guidestar account. I'm pretty sure she wrote all of the ones that start off with "Amanda is an amazing person!" It's pretty obvious.

October 12, 2012: Amanda Lollar is using Bat World donations to place ads to buy Facebook fans. If fans are donating it would make sense. If they are not, they are just an ego booster for Lollar. I was given a coupon for free Facebook ads. I ran and ad. I got fans but no donations so it wouldn't make sense to continue.

October 5, 2012: Randy Turner attorney faxed me a letter stating that I am violating the court order. He stated I didn't remove everything in the order. I went through all of my sites again. There is nothing in this page that is in the order. I am not violating the order. I did post the order. The order does not state I can't post the order which is a public document. And again, everything in the order is the absolute truth. It is not defamation. Some items are about Randy Turner who is not a plaintiff in the case so that can't be defamation. Some are items government agencies or members of the public wrote. Again, that can't be my defamation. Some are items Amanda Lollar herself wrote such as her manual. That can't possibly be my defamation. In my appeal I of course have listed all of the items and shown that they are not defamation. I will be posting this public legal document on my appeal's page linked above.

I will be posting the actual sources of what I posted here. This is an email exchange between Lollar's direct neighbor and the City Manager. Her neighbor stated her building was gutted. The City Manager said her personal items were removed. Evans is the neighbor. Rusher is the new owner. Lance is the City Manager. Below this I post the actual document so you can read it yourself. THEY wrote those things. That can't be my defamation.

From: Sharlet Evans sharlet7@msn.com To: Lance Howerton citymanager@mineralwellstx.gov 01/17/12

FYI: Rusher spent Saturday gutting the building. He is working in the evening, also. Have you or Robert spoken with him yet, to see what his intentions are, for the building?

Best regards, Sharley Evans

From: Lance Howerton citymanager@mineralwellstx.gov To: Sharlet Evans sharlet7@msn.com

Sharlet

Robert has spoken to both Michael and Jonathan Rusher about the building and has made them aware that the building cannot be used simply for warehousing. Robert also told me that they are working on the inside of the building and trying to clean it up and also get the rest of Amanda Lollar's belongings out of the building. The Rushers told Robert that they understood what the uses of the building could be and that they had a couple of prospects that they might be able to put into the building. Hopefully, this answers your questions at this point.

Lance Howerton City Manager

Here is a link to the document Link

October 3, 2012: I did a judicial information act request to get a copy of Judge Bonnie Sudderth's request for vacation during the exact time of my trial. The request was not made by Judge Bonnie. It was made by someone else on February 10, 2012. This was after we had our court date set. The person who made the request was not on vacation that week. I don't know what to make of this. The request was not made by the court coordinator. I won't say who made the request because I'm sure the person is innocent of any wrong doing. It does make me wonder if the fact that Judge William Brigham donated to Judge Bonnie Sudderth's campaign to be a Judge might have had something to do with it. Judge Sudderth was fair in her pre-trial motions. Of course she had Judge Brigham over see the temporary injunction hearing and my trial. I'd rather Judge Sudderth had been unfair in the pre-trial motions and fair for the injunction hearing and trial. Nothing I can do about it now. Just saw that the law firm of Bailey & Galyen donated money to Judge Bonnie Sudderth.

Someone pointed out to me that Randy Turner and his wife Patti Gearhart Turner were (are?) part of the Innocence Project I believe of Texas. The Innocence Project helps those wrongly accused of crimes who are in prison. Supposedly Turner worked to free innocent people from prison. I believe the client did pay him $300/hr. This is extremely ironic which just shows you how personal Randy Turner has made this case. I'm sure he realizes his client is guilty of animal cruelty, animal neglect, violations of the health code, Animal Welfare Act, Texas Parks & Wildlife Department not to mention libel, defamation, yet he is aiding and abetting her. He is helping someone who violates the law to harm an innocent person, me. I made honest reports with photos and videos. She was investigated. She was not found to be innocent of all charges as she falsely claims. That's why she sold the wild sanctuary building. In a letter to the City she claimed she couldn't stand all the complaints against her so she's moving out. The new owner as per the City Manager and neighbor "gutted" the building and "removed" Lollar's personal belongings. I posted the email which proves this here. I am merely copy/pasting the city official's words.

September 19, 2012: Bat World Sanctuary buying more ads on Facebook. Here is but one and it has a misspelling.

September 17, 2012: Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary has been buying ads on Facebook to get more fans. Here is one of her ads.

Amanda Lollar ordered parts of the transcript of the last hearing. I got a copy of it at a discount for that reason. Judge Jeffrey Walker stated that Judge Bonnie Sudderth requested Judge William Brigham to oversee my trial. I can understand why she would not want to oversee my trial because Judge Brigham oversaw my temporary injunction hearing. Judge Bonnie Sudderth stated at the hearing to amend and void the injunction that she would not have forced me to remove items I did not write, post or control. Judge William Brigham forced me to remove items I did not write, post, control and had not even seen. The Appeals Court is the only way to deal with this issue now.

September 7, 2012: I just saw my appeal online. Here it is.Case number 02-12-00285-CV. I filed notice of appeal twice. Court should be getting the second notice soon. I just sent in my Civil Docketing Statement.

September 6, 2012: Just looked at Judge Jeffrey Walker's order on my motion to reconsider recusal. He wrote that my motions were not timely. I waited until after Judge William Brigham ruled in the trial to complain. Judge Jeffrey Walker is wrong. I did not know I could file a motion to recuse him or else I would have done it the second I knew he would be the Judge. Also, I filed the motion before Judge William Brigham signed the order. The oral order and written order are very different. On top of this the Judge did not notify me on my right to recuse the Judge. While Judges cannot give legal advice they MUST advise pro se litigants of their rights. I've been in small claims before and if there is a substitute Judge, the substitute tells everyone they have the right to recuse. I didn't know I could do it in district court. Judge William Brigham did not notify me of this. I even quoted a case where a Judge failed to tell a defendant he could appeal his decision. The court ultimately ruled in the favor of the pro se defendant because the Judge had a duty to inform him of his rights. Judge Jeffrey Walker even remembered the case I cited but still ruled against me. I don't believe this was a fair ruling. I filed the motion to recuse the moment I realized that I could. I filed it within two hours.

In the written order Judge Jeffrey Walker cites TRCP 18 a(h)(1). There is no such rule. There is only TRCP 18 a(h). There is no (1).

September 4, 2012: I just filed an amended motion for new trial, modify court order along with a request for findings of fact and motion for telephonic hearing. Hopefully these will be set for hearings soon.

September 1, 2012: Randy Turner just lost a lawsuit. He thinks a Judge doesn't understand the law. "Randy Turner, Phillips' attorney, says he's confident the ruling won't stand. "This will be a short-lived victory. I have absolutely no doubt in my mind it will be reversed by the Dallas Court of Appeals," he says. "Problem is, we have a trial judge who unfortunately didn't understand the law. I don't blame her. She's a family law judge and doesn't deal with things like this." The case had to do with family law. His client received a lot of money for being in prison when he was innocent. His wife wanted some of the money because they were married while he was in prison and she had a baby with him.

Last night I tried to get to my MySpace account but couldn't. I thought it was a glitch. I tried again this morning and my account is gone. I didn't even get an email. I bet Amanda Lollar reported my account saying it violated the court order. I just got the order around 5:00 pm yesterday. Here is a copy of my MySpace page. If Amanda Lollar did indeed get my account deleted illegally, I will be adding this to my lawsuit against her.

August 31, 2012: I just received the Judge's signed order. I just removed all of the 100% truthful statements which I made about Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary. Every word I posted was the absolute truth. I believe Amanda Lollar just wanted them removed because they make her look bad. People have been reporting and complaining about Amanda Lollar for years. I replaced the missing items with ***. I will be posting the Judge's signed order. It's a public document. You can see what I deleted from this page.

August 25, 2012: I have not received Judge Jeffrey Walker's court order yet but the Plaintiffs have. They posted it online. I lost my motion to reconsider recusal. I don't agree with the Judge's ruling. I had new facts and evidence. Judge Brigham must be recused from overseeing over my motion for new trial and objections to judgement. I filed my initial motion to recuse as timely as possible because they never told me Brigham would preside over my trial. As a pro se I should have been notified of my right to recuse Judge Brigham the second he showed up at trial. I was denied a fair trial. Plaintiffs also posted part of the Judge's previous order. I was supposedly sanctioned under Rule 18 (a)(h) 1. I can't be legally sanctioned under this Rule as I read it. I didn't file the motion to delay anything. Plus there is no Rule 18(a)(h)1. There is no "1." I just read a few articles on recusal and went through Rule 18 again. The only reason I can think why I lost was because of timeliness. Again, I wrote and filed a recusal within two hours of knowing that Brigham would be the Judge in my upcoming hearings. The articles did say that the proper way to deal with a Judge not applying law properly or reading exhibits is by appeal.

August 23, 2012: This is tooo funny. I just received this "anonymous" email. "SOMEONE WHO HAS POSTED BAD THINGS ABOUT YOU HAS AGREED TO DISMANTLE ALL THE NEGATIVE STUFF ON-LINE ABOUT YOU IF YOU DO THE SAME FIRST THE BLOGGING HAS RUINED YOUR LIFE FINANCIALLY BUT YOU CAN TAKE THIS STEP TO MUTUALLY GET RID OF ALL THE NEGATIVE STUFF WHEN YOUR NEGATIVE CRAP LEAVES THE WEB SO WILL THEIRS." One, all caps. Trying to hide writing style. Two, intentional bad grammar. Again, trying to hide writing style. Who could this be? How ever will I know what to remove? I've only posted negative yet totally honest things about Eric Shupps and Amanda Lollar. Those are the two who currently have posted negative things about me. I made this offer to Shupps earlier but he refused. Instead he posted more crap about me. Is this because the Judge signed the court order ordering WordPress to give me the identities of the two WordPress bloggers who are most likely Shupps and Lollar. How extremely childish. At least they admit they caused financial damages.

August 22, 2012: Amanda Lollar is still posting juvenile nasty comments about me on her websites/blogs. She is extremely concerned with my physical appearance. I'm starting to think she may be a lesbian. She did tell me that she can't wait to get rid of her husband Larry. She said after she divorces him she has no desire to be with a man again. These posts and comments are really going to make her look horrible in trial. I never made any comments about her looks. I only care about her actions toward animals.

August 20, 2012: Just filed Defendant's Motion to Reconsider Recusal of Judge William Brigham and sanctions. Here is the filing. I believe I am legally entitled to recuse and disqualify Judge Brigham. I also filed motion for telephonic hearing if it's an option.

August 18, 2012: Got back from Texas last night. I lost my motion to recuse on technicalities. Plaintiffs lost their motion for sanctions because my motion was not groundless. Judge Jeffrey Walker overall was fine. I still believe I was in the right with my motion. It was timely. There isn't even a hearing date for my motion for new trial, objections to court order. I most certainly filed my motion to recuse at least ten days before that hearing date. Randy Turner again tried to say that I wrote, posted some items which I most certainly did not. I couldn't verify it in the court room but I did just now.

Before court I went to the clerk's office to look at the docket and filings online. 206 filings in this silly little meritless case. Here it is. Randy Turner obviously was trying to paper me to death. In trial he said he's never spent (wasted?) more time on a case ever. I personally have never sued anyone if I didn't think I could get something out of it. That would be stupid. I believe Randy Turner continued with this meritless case out of stubbornness, ego and spite.

August 14, 2012: Someone is posting a lot of blog entries as "Randy Turner Fort Worth Attorney" on random articles. I think Randy Turner gave more money to Reputation Defender. He is wasting his money. This will not help the search engine results for his name. He should make RD give him back all of his money. They haven't helped his reputation at all.

August 10, 2012: I filed my response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Rule 13 sanctions and response to my motion to recuse Judge William Brigham. It's here. Texas attorney Randy Turner's filing was riddled with mistakes, errors and huge lies. Because he's done this repeatedly, I don't believe it's a mistake. I believe he is intentionally lying to the court. He most certainly did that in the trial. He told the Judge I admitted to posting something in my deposition. I did not post that. I didn't admit to posting it. It was written by an anon person. Then Randy Turner cried crocodile tears. It's bad enough when a woman does that but a man? Extremely pathetic and low. I've never met a more despicable attorney in my life, and I've met a lot of lawyers. The post in question merely stated he was unethical which he is. We have a hearing this Friday.

August 2, 2012: Attorney Randy Turner just filed a crazy response to my motion to recuse and for Rule 13 sanctions. Again, he does not let facts stand in his way. I did not add Eric Shupps to my Federal lawsuit. I don't have the subpoena response to that item yet. I would be suing Shupps because of his behavior after the trial. He is libeling me on the Internet as a private individual. They also sent veiled threats against me and my volunteers. I did add Dottie Hyatt to my Federal lawsuit. I added her because she's on the board of directors. I was going to add her from the beginning and I told her as such. I didn't add her because she was a witness in the Texas lawsuit. That's absurd. I had to add the board of directors because it seems their D&O Insurance was dropped. I need to go after them personally for my damages.

The temporary injunction is now void as the trial is over. I can post those items if I like though I have not done so. A last note. The court of appeals sent me a letter saying that the court order has not yet been signed. They can't accept the case until the court order is signed. I will call them tomorrow to verify. I also got a copy of the Judge's letter saying he won't recuse himself voluntarily. Here it is.What's this "Dear Jeff" stuff? Not even trying to hide how well they know each other.

August 1, 2012: I just emailed most of the users I received from my subpoena. I'm giving them two days to remove their blogs and comments. If they don't, I add them to the lawsuit. Most of the users were Amanda Lollar and Rebecca Dmytryk. Obviously I will still be suing these two.

July 31, 2012: Here is a sampling of Amanda Lollar talking to herself about me in a few user names on her YouTube channel. Talk about childish. How embarrassing. No wonder she fought the subpoenas.

BWSvMC: Repeating what KerryKessler posted: The symptoms of psychopathy include: lack of a conscience or sense of guilt, lack of empathy, egocentricity, pathological lying, repeated violations of social norms, disregard for the law, shallow emotions, and a history of victimizing others. Psychopaths cannot understand the emotional value people attach to certain words, only their​ dictionary definition, thus their attempt​ to use emotional words leads to consequential clumsiness. -Hare, R. (1999). Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of Psychopaths Among Us.

MsJryan72: Mary looks toxic! Wow what an evil human being​ she is. Bottom is a long way down for her!!

Clara24CA: Oh, did I mention that it looks like her hair is doing everything it can to depart her wrinkling head? I've looked better the​ morning after a sorority initiation.(Amanda didn't even finish high school let alone attend college)

Clara24CA: I've only watched 5 videos so far and I can CLEARLY tell this woman in insane. Who the hell, qualified to scratch their nose in the field, doesn't know that Iso (Isoflurane) is perfectly legal for civilian use almost everywhere EXCEPT California? And beat me with a judge's gavel, but who the hell receives a certificate of being an "expert" in anything? Einstein never received such a document, Dr. Stephen Hawking - to my knowledge - has never received such a document, nor any other individual, scholar or otherwise. I've seen Ms. Scummin's (sorry typo) resume' and if I laughed any harder​ I'd be stuffing organs back up through my privates. She has absolutely NO room to be slapping anyone about education, in my opinion. WHAT A MORON!"

Talk about childish attacks on me personally. Amanda Lollar seems to be very into looks. She really has a chip on her shoulder because she didn't even finish high school. And why is she talking about her privates? That's disgusting.

July 30, 2012: The identities of the John Does who've been libeling me are ... Amanda Lollar, Rebecca Dmytryk and a few more. Mainly it's bat lady and her friend Dmytryk. The data also proves they pre-dated the posts to appear to be out of statute of limitations. They aren't.

Amanda Lollar pretended to be a 24 year old girl named Clara from California who works with Bat Conservation. She also pretended to be Ms J Ryan born in 1972. Nope, just a 56 year old woman in Mineral Wells, Texas commenting to herself. She sure had some nasty and defamatory things to say about me. Lollar was literally having conversations with herself.

Just got an updated Fish & Wildlife response. Bat World has a F&W permit for the flying fox but they lied on their application. They said Denise Tomlinson who lives in Florida will be in charge of care of the bat. She lives in Florida. Bat is in Texas. Bat World also said ONLY personnel go into the fruit bat cage. How di Randy Turner end up in there? He's not trained personnel, doesn't even have his pre-exposure shots.

July 26, 2012: Judge Jeff Walker will be hearing my motion to recuse Judge William Brigham. I believe if Brigham is recused, that means the order, because it was never signed, must be thrown out. A new Judge can't sign the order because he didn't hear the case. A new trial with a new judge would be in order. Back to Texas. My friends at the ACLU stated that Randy Turner and Amanda Lollar should have waited for the order to be signed before releasing news.

July 24, 2012: Just spoke with court coordinator. Judge William Brigham has not signed an order. He received my motion to recuse him which is why he did not sign the order. He wrote a letter to Administrative Judge Jeff Walker stating he will not recuse himself voluntarily, I think. I am now awaiting Judge Jeff Walker to set the hearing for motion to recuse Judge William Brigham. Judge Jeff Walker is supposedly the one who appointed Judge William Brigham to oversee my trial for "judicial" reasons, whatever that means.

Just won my hearing on motion to compel Google to reply to subpoena. They will give me the John Does.

July 22, 2012: I forgot to post this a while ago. A complaint was filed against attorney Randy Turner. Not by me. I'll be filing one later. Randy Turner admitted this in email. May 17, 2011: "The only other grievance filed against me in my career was by a defendant I sued in a pro bono animal case." I'm not the only one complaining about Randy Turner.

July 17, 2012: Judge gave his oral order June 14, 2012. Still no signed order. I haven't received a notice of hearing on my motion for new trial and objections to court order or my motion to recuse Judge William Brigham. I will go through more of the items from the proposed court order. They are all the TRUTH. I will also call the court today to see what is happening.

Bat World admits on their facebook page they're making money off benefit wines. Larry Crittenden posted this comment "Larry Crittenden: Doing my best to help [hic], it's for the bats, you know. ;)" This is actually sad. When I was in the kitchen around midnight with Amanda Lollar washing up after feeding babies Larry Crittenden came downstairs from the bedroom with a bottle of red wine that was open. He then put the corked bottle of RED wine into the FREEZER. One, you don't chill red wine. True connoisseurs don't even chill white wine. Two, if you chill any wine, you put it in the frig. If you put a corked bottle of wine into the freezer it will either burst or spill out and freeze. He must have been drunk to accidentally put it in the freezer. Amanda Lollar gave him a strange look when he did it. She said he drinks too much. Then I told her he can't put a corked bottle in the freezer. She put it in the frig. Amanda Lollar herself also drinks but just beer. I'd see her drink 2-3 beers a night while feeding the unreleasable bats while watching movies. Sad lives to drink too much.

I am going to go statement by statement from the order to show that what I posted was 100% the truth. Here is the first statement, ******* Yes, they do. Amanda Lollar admitted this in the trial, at hearings, in her deposition and in the following documents, even her own book and website. Here is proof that I told the truth.

July 14, 2012: Went through my trial notes. When Judge William Brigham came into the court room he said paraphrased "I have been assigned this case by District Judge Jeff Walker. There are judicial reasons for me to hear this case." I know Judge Bonnie Sudderth did not want to rule on another Judge's ruling. I know that Randy Turner wanted Judge William Brigham to hear this case because they have a "relationship." District Judge Jeff Walker will be the one who reads my motion to recuse. This may not go too well. I think it was Texas politics at play. My Texas relatives warned me.

Two days ago I saw a case summary of my case on Judge Bonnie Sudderth's personal website. It was not accurate. This is not Judge Bonnie Sudderth's fault because she didn't preside over the trial. I realize her intern was there during the trial but he didn't see the exhibits and was not the Judge. I feel if Judge Bonnie Sudderth had presided over the case and there were no Texas politics, the outcome and case summary would have been very different. I asked Judge Sudderth to either edit or remove the case summary because it was not accurate. Again, there was no proof of any silly "Google bombs" because they are impossible and I didn't even try to do that. I only do legal and proper SEO. Judge Sudderth kindly removed the case summary.

July 13, 2012: UPDATE: Just figured out how to get a new Judge. Just filed motion to recuse Judge William Brigham as the Judge in my case. Here is the filing. Here is a more legible version.I should have been given notice that Judge William Brigham would be the judge for the trial at least ten days before the trial started. I was not given notice. I would have objected for obvious reasons if I'd been given notice. Made a typo. Had to file a notice of errata here. I accidentally typed "motion to rescue" instead of "motion to recuse." I do more rescuing than I do recusing.

Just found out that Judge William Brigham is still handling my case. That means he will read my motion for new trial, objections to judgment and notice of appeal. This makes no sense. There is a MAJOR conflict of interest with Randy Turner and Judge William Brigham. Need to figure out how to get a new Judge.

Just saw Bat World Sanctuary's 990 form from the IRS for 2010. Here it is. This shows that Amanda Lollar lied in court to the Judge. She had more revenue than she claimed on the chart she made. I also see that Leslie Sturges and Kate Rugroden are listed as board members. I will be adding them to my California case. Nice to have everyone's addresses here. I already added the other board members last week. I contacted Sturges and she told me she was no longer on the board. That's not what this 990 says. She was a board member when I was injured.

Take a look at the $25,000 cash she had at the end of 2010. When I was there she said she was so broke she was going to have to shut down Bat World. Why would she shut down her money maker? Bat World pays her rent. Another interesting thing is the supposed amount of money she spent to rehab a few bats. She took in 422 bats and released 234 bats at a cost of $128,000. That's $547 per released bat or $303 for each bat she took in. I don't think that's real. Plus, that would be a live release rate of 55% which would be horrible. Mine is around 90% live release. I took in $2,500 in 2005 and rescued 1,300 animals or $2/animal. My animals are bigger, eat more food, must be housed separately. I did get some food donations but still. Plus how did she spend $19,000 educating people about bats? You take some bats to a school and talk for an hour or so. Not only that but they get paid for the presentations.

This tax return was signed 12/11. That means they were late. More interesting things about this tax return. Here is her exhibit which she gave to the Judge about her finances. Mine is also in here. My chart shows the revenue based on her bank statements. It looks like she just made her's up out of thin air. Here it is.I showed mine to the Judge and attached all of the actual bank statements. They were accepted as an exhibit. Lollar just handed this one page chart with no underlying documents. In order to prove defamation you must show financial damages, same with breach of contract. There were no damages. Texas, probably the most unjust state in the US. I really thought CA or NY would be more corrupt but I'm obviously wrong.

As per her chart which she presented to the Judge as BWS revenue 2007 $135,051, 2008 $124,848, 2009 $144,543, 2010 $132,775, 2011 $72,289.

As per the summary of her financial documents which I am allowed to share 2010 $93,198, 2011 $170,891. She manipulated these numbers to make it seem that her 2010 income was higher and 2011 income was lower. Her 2011 income was more than double what she showed the Judge.

As per her IRS form 2006 $110,000, 2007 $154,119, 2008 $130,610, 2009 $149,703, 2010 $145,348. All three of these reports are very different. I believe that means they are not true. I'll get ahold of her 2011 990 form.

July 12, 2012: More perjury by Amanda Lollar? In her deposition I asked her if B.A.T.S. owned the building at 115 N.E. 1st St. She said "no, Bat World owned the building." B.A.T.S. transferred the building to Bat World right before she sold it this year. In court Amanda Lollar said she only sold the bottom half of the building. She sold the entire building. Such bold faced lies and for absolutely no reason.

Activity in Yahoo group WorldBatLine has decreased over the years. This happened before I ever went to Bat World. Here is the proof. Amanda Lollar admitted in trial she had no proof that I caused any damages or anything at Bat World. She also admitted she had no proof of financial damages. More proof that the Judge did not rule according to the facts and evidence presented at trial. You must show damages and causation for both defamation and breach of contract.

July 10, 2012: Someone just told me what Microsoft Certified means. It means someone paid Microsoft $150 to take a 90 minute test about Microsoft products. It doesn't mean they were trained or worked at Microsoft. Sounds like a great racket almost like EST or Summit. There are many different tests you can take at different levels. Some offer cheat sheets. I mention this because that looks like the only "training" Eric Shupps has. I bet I could easily become certified in some Microsoft products.

Last week I asked Eric Shupps @eshupps of BinaryWave SharePoint to stop libeling me. I said I'd stop responding with the truth if he would stop libeling me. I did not Google bomb. I did not write the articles. He continued to libel me. I then emailed him again telling him that I'm sending subpoenas out for the identities of the Twitter, Wordpress accounts. He Tweeted that he would not speak to me in email. He would only communicate with me publicly on Twitter. I tweeted the same to him on public Twitter as he requested. His reply was "did you write this?" Eric Shupps is all hat and no cattle. I will continue to post the truth every time he libels me. I will be adding him to my defamation lawsuit. What he said in court was protected but what he said outside of court is not.

This is very interesting. This Twitter account is related to ones that are libeling me. It is Kelly Bozeman's Twitter account. She is the paralegal for attorney Randy Turner. Kelly Bozeman's twitter account. Looks like she's just a paralegal part time. Her business card and phone number are in there. Randy Turner defamed me and now it looks like his assistant is probably also defaming me via Twitter user Daisy Peachtree @peachtreedaisy

I just won my motion to extend discovery and add parties. I will be sending out subpoenas to get the identities of the people libeling me. I can add them to my CA Federal defamation lawsuit against Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary. I believe Lollar et al were defaming me like crazy this week thinking I would not be able to send subpoenas to get the identities or add others to the lawsuit.

"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." I saw what you Tweeted. Amanda Lollar, Eric Shupps and friends. Think wisely before you act. If you show up at my volunteers' homes, they have been instructed to call the police immediately. If you post their addresses, I will post yours. I offered a truce last week and instead you continue to harass me.

Just to give people an idea about Amanda Lollar's friends I may post the criminal rap sheet and mug shot of her female LA attorney friend. Amanda Lollar stated in court she is working with this person. Amanda Lollar also admitted to working with Rebecca Dmytryk. Dmytryk who was kicked off the oil spill team also went bankrupt. She was then sued for bankruptcy fraud and lost. Because of her behavior the California Wildlife Center had to get a restraining order against her. I think the order is linked below. Both of these women have histories of physical violence. These are Amanda Lollar's friends.

I just filed a notice of appeal.I filed a motion for new trial June 18, 2012. I had to file within 30 days of the end of trial which I did. I must file my appeal within 90 days of the end of trial or September 14, 2012. I still have not received the Judge's signed order.

July 9, 2012: Legally I can't sue witness Eric Shupps for any libel or defamation he said in court. I can try to get the court to go after him for perjury. He knew the software did not and could not show the true author yet he said I authored the articles. He knew it was possible for people to take pdfs, photos, copy/paste text from my website and post them elsewhere yet he said I did that. He also lied and said that an article was posted 40 minutes after it was on my website. There's no way anyone can ever know the exact minute I posted something on my website. Plus, he is wrong. I only saw the Indybay articles for the first time when a Google bot alerted me to them after they were posted.

I can however sue him for libel, defamation, slander that he said outside of the courtroom. That would be his recent tweets. That would also be the items he put on Amanda Lollar's website about Google bombs. That was not part of court testimony. Those items are untrue defamation. They also do not prove that I set off a "Google bomb." Google bombs are impossible today. Oddly enough Eric Shupps and Amanda Lollar are trying to set off a Google bomb on Twitter. They are just spamming.

Amanda Lollar has publicly shared a copy of my driver's license. I have not shared her driver's license. So far these people have libeled, threatened and harassed me. I have not returned the favor. Perhaps I should. One good thing is that Lollar and friends think that I can't add them or any new libel to my lawsuit. For this reason they are being totally reckless and crazy. I've copied all of it. They are wrong in their assumption.

July 8, 2012: Soon I will start posting a ton of videos of Amanda Lollar's deposition. She thinks it's fine to post mine so I'm sure she be thankful if I return the favor. I will share such videographic gems as "where does it say that I CAN'T perform surgery? Where?" and paraphrased "I only finished the 9th grade" and "I learned everything from trial and error!" I finally viewed her entire deposition video. I will also be doing a "best of" attorney Randy Turner. I had no idea he was chewing his fingers, staring at me, patting his belly, staring at me, laughing at a joke someone sent him via email... I'm amazed that he lied to the newscaster and said the stills of him at my depo are him but the descriptions I wrote are "all lies!" Why would I lie about someone let alone a nasty attorney? Plus, you can clearly see him do these things in the video. Why would I lie about something that was videotaped?

This is kind of ironic. Had he settled in mediation he could have gotten most of these things removed forever. Instead he chooses to waste more of his time, money only to receive no money and all of the items and then some stay online. Not very wise.

The trial is over so the temporary injunction is now void. I can repost the photos and videos. I will wait to see the final order before I do that. In the meantime I will post photos that weren't in the preliminary order. Some pics of Amanda Lollar performing surgery. She is giving the bat oxygen because it stopped breathing because she gave it too much anesthesia. She tried to suture the bat but ripped out the stitches. She ended up just putting some glue on the bat.

Here Amanda Lollar is holding a bat which she told us most likely had rabies in her bare hand. The temporary injunction said I couldn't post the video. It didn't say anything about stills.

*** Here she is pinching and pulling the head of a baby bat with her finger nails. Later you would see some blood there. Baby died though it was born pink.

***

Amanda Lollar is pulling the baby by its head. Makes you wonder why it died. She said "she's going to prolapse" at this exact frame.

***

Amanda Lollar is pulling the baby and the umbilicus. The placenta is still attached to the uterine wall here as you can see by the tight cord. You can see the vagina inverting. It is pink. The placenta is dark red and still attached. That would mean the uterus was being pulled down through the vagina. The mom is kicking and screaming. You see her convulse then she passed out, thank god. In Lollar's book she says never pull the umbilicus yet she pulled it. I think she meant to cut it with her fingernail but she forgot she was wearing gloves for once. You should never pull the cord because you can cause uterine inversion, prolapse. I will do a more detailed break down still by still. She said "the opening is too big" at this frame.

***

The entire video is available online.

July 6, 2012: Just received a letter from attorney Randy Turner of Bailey & Galyen. I'd noted below that he sent a letter with the judgment directly to Judge William Brigham's home address. Yes, he blacked out the address but he blacked it out character for character. I noticed that it was the same length as the Judge's home address. Judge William Brigham called up Randy Turner's office and told them to send the letter to the court instead of his house as he doesn't conduct business at home. Here's the letter. Judge's home address is not in it. I still wonder why they even had his home address. Kelly Bozeman said she didn't know where to send the letter because Judge William Brigham was a visiting Judge. William Brigham retired in 1999 and has been a visiting Judge since that time. That means they haven't had a case before him before as a visiting Judge. I assume that means they had his home address because Randy Turner is friends with the Judge. Turner did tell me that he's known this Judge for years. Good ole boys?

July 4, 2012: Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary continues to buy domain names in her quest to libel and defame me. She is buying domain names with my name in them and Randy Turner's name. She still can't get the domain names to pull up in the search results she wants. She's wasting a ton of money buying all those names. It is at least great evidence for my defamation case against her.

July 2, 2012: Here is Eric Shupps resume, curriculum vitae. Just as I remembered, no education. A note. MVPs are volunteers. They don't work for Microsoft. They give "Most Valuable Professional" designation to people who promote their products as volunteers. I do beta testing for some software and I am also an MVP. It doesn't mean much. Based on his resume he has jumped around from one job to the next for many years. Not very stable. I also noted that he started working in 1985. He was born 11-4-1971. That means he started working at 14. Sounds like another possible high school drop out. That would explain all the grammatical errors in his resume and the fact that he tries to sound "educated." Is it common to drop out of high school in Texas? It is very, very uncommon where I live. Lollar is the first person I've known who dropped out of high school.

Just read through Eric Shupps of BinaryWave trial transcript. Here is my cross examination of Eric Shupps of BinaryWave, Sharepoint. The minutes make him look really bad. He comes across as totally crazy. I'm amazed he'd allow Amanda Lollar to post them. It is extremely clear he does not know what he is talking about. He admits he's not an expert. He admits he's never used the software before for a client. He also comes across as a want-to-appear-to-be-a-know-it-all. He uses basic words incorrectly. I think he's trying to appear "learned" by using bigger words but he doesn't know the meaning, such as "Google bomb." I think he has a chip on his shoulder because he didn't go to college, just like Amanda Lollar. Randy Turner, Amanda Lollar, Eric Shupps. Three very similar ego-centric people. The perfect storm. PS, Turner did go to college and law school. I'm not saying he is not educated. He just has a similar personality to the other two.

Some of the trial transcript of my cross-examination of Eric Shupps of BinaryWave.

Eric Shupps: I'm sorry, Your Honor. I don't know if I'm allowed to ask questions.

Judge William Brigham: You're not. You're to respond to the questions Ms. Cummins asks you.

(BY MS. CUMMINS) Have you ever been an expert witness in deposition for authorship?

Eric Shupps: No.

Q. Have you ever been an expert witness for authorship before?

Eric Shupps: No.

Q. So this is your first time?

Eric Shupps: Yes.

Q. Well, then let me ask you a question: If you were to give this software program the possible authors of Groucho, Chico, and Harpo Marx and then you gave it a copy of Moby Dick, and asked them which Marx Brothers wrote of the Marx Brothers wrote it, would it have to pick one of the Marx brothers?

Eric Shupps: Yes, it would. That’s what closed class attribution is all about.

Q. So you just stated that you're not an expert?

Eric Shupps: I believe I have maintained that all along. Yes.

Q. Do you realize that this software is a beta software?

Eric Shupps: Of course, yes.

Q. Again, do you have some physical proof or evidence that can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that I absolutely wrote and posted those articles on Indybay?

Eric Shupps: There is no evidence that would exist to that.

Q. A few last questions. You stated earlier that this is the first time you've been an expert witness in of law, correct?

Eric Shupps: Correct.

Q. How many other times have you done authorship analysis of online content? How many other reports have you done for clients for pay?

Eric Shupps: For clients for pay. None.

Q. So this is the first time you've done one of these for a client, and it's the first time you've been an expert witness in court, correct?

Eric Shupps: That is correct.

Q. And just so we're clear, are you 100 percent certain that I wrote all of the blogs in Animal Advocates that you used that you attributed to me?

Eric Shupps: No.

Q. Okay. So you -- have you ever heard of the term garbage in, garbage out?

Eric Shupps: I'm very familiar with that term.

For the life of me I don't know what possessed Eric Shupps to agree to be an "authorship" expert in this case. He is clearly not an authorship expert. He's probably an expert on Sharepoint software, beer and whiskey. He's also never testified in deposition or court before. This is the first time he used this free beta software for a client. Even the author of the software said it should not be used to determine authorship or used in a court of law. I'm also shocked that attorney Randy Turner would put this guy on the stand. He didn't help his case. When the Judge read the verdict he only mentioned the handwriting expert, not Eric Shupps. I am not shocked that Amanda Lollar is now posting all over the Internet that Eric Shupps is an "expert" who "helped" her case. Clueless. She is just showing the world that she had no case.

I googled for five minutes today. Others have called him out about being an insecure jerk. In one crazy exchange he asks someone if the new SharePoint has a plethora of new amenities. The guy says ya. Then Eric Shupps grills him on the definition of "plethora." Juvenile. I think Shupps was just jealous that he didn't get to check the new software out first. This reminds me of Amanda Lollar intentionally using the latin names of common bats instead of the regular name. She thinks it makes her look "smart." I also saw that he just got a business loan for BinaryWave from Lighter Capital. Don't they realize that Eric Shupps went bankrupt? He declared BinaryWave to be worth nothing. He defaulted on a previous business loan. Why would anyone loan him money?

When I first looked at Eric Shupps @eshupps #sharepoint Twitter email mvp of BinaryWave's resume and website I felt something fishy. It seemed really fake. When I met him in court my feelings were confirmed. Okay, first I incorrectly thought he was my process server so I said "hello." Did not recognize him without the jeans, belt and cowboy hat. Anyway in court he basically just bullshitted about "Google bombs" when he didn't even know the basic definition. He also bullshitted about the authorship software. His presentation was laughable yet he kept insisting. My gut feeling was correct. I ran one records check and found a recent bankruptcy filing. Here it is, a public document. His SS# is not listed. He ran up a bunch of credit cards, bought two trucks with loans, had a big loan on his little house, has an ex-wife, owes her child support, has a current wife, has two kids and is only 40. He admits in his filing that his company BinaryWave is worthless. He admits he barely makes any money, definitely not enough to support his "lifestyle" of fine beer and whiskey and traveling abroad. That explains his behavior in court. He acted like he knew that I knew he was a fraud. So many frauds. Bat experts, IT experts...

Eric Shupps stated that he had to take care of his dad who was dying of cancer. That doesn't jive with the bankruptcy docs or his Facebook page. He filed for BK October 2010. His dad died January 2012. Plus, you don't vacation around the world when your dad is dying. I didn't leave town at all when I took care of my grandmother. I only see a small medical bill for a child in the docs. Story teller just like his clients. How do these people live with themselves with all the stories they tell? I'm trying to figure out how to get the courts to go after someone for perjury. Donations were not down at Bat World as Lollar stated. They were way up. Lollar even made a fake chart for the Judge.

Judge William Brigham has not sent his final judgment to the court as of today. He probably received it June 26. It should only take a day to mail it. Perhaps he is rewriting it so it doesn't include prior restraint and third party writings.

I sued Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary for my personal injury claim June 2012. They did not respond so I filed a request for default. I emailed their Los Angeles attorney twice about the case and no response. He responded today to say that he is not representing Lollar or Bat World. The attorney representing them is not with Chubb. I don't know this for certain but it sounds like Bat World lost their insurance. I don't blame Chubb. If they had any idea what they were doing at Bat World, they never would have insured them. I have E&O insurance for my license. If I don't renew in time or don't renew, it does not cover me for past losses. Maybe that is what happened? She was denied a renewal and lost previous coverage. Lollar now has what I believe is a young attorney who passed the bar 12/2009. He works out of a 600 sq.ft. studio condo in Westwood. He doesn't work for a firm.

June 29, 2012: Just received a copy of the proposed court order. This proves that the case was meritless. It also proves that the Judge did not read the exhibits. In court Judge Brigham ordered me to remove items in Exhibits 17 and 18. Exhibit 18 was items written and posted by others on websites I don't control. This proposed order does not have one word from Exhibit 18. On top of this every item they want removed is the truth. There are 46 items, all are the truth. Most are not even statements of fact. Some are personal opinion. A few items have nothing to do with Plaintiffs. Most were written by Lollar herself or government agencies. Here it is. It is unconstitutional as it contains prior restraint. They cannot force me not to post something in the future. It is also overly broad and against third parties. They cannot force me to remove items written by others. They want the rabies report against Bat World removed. That was written by a government agency in 1999, over ten years before I knew her. She wants to hide all the negative things people have said about her over the past 18 years. She wants me to remove her 1994 manual where she recommends freezing bats to death which is inhumane. She believes her own manual is "defamation." SHE wrote it!

She wants me to remove this "***." Lollar wrote this in a court document, "Defendant has made it impossible for Plaintiffs to remain in Mineral Wells because of her rampage of complaints to the city and health dept." Lollar also wrote that she is leaving Mineral Wells because she can't be bothered with all the complaints against her. I posted her letter to the city. In court she said three people have been complaining about her for years.

She wants me to remove this *** Lollar brags about having a captive breeding colony. She posts their genealogy in her book and online. The warden stated she is letting the bats breed in writing. Those are the two main topics she wants removed. Both are the absolute truth.

Here's another *** Yes, she is. Her bats have tested positive for rabies. She is not checking people's cards. She admitted this in court. She tried to blame Kate Rugroden for that saying it was her job.

And another, "***." True.

Another ***There are photos of her with dirty nails. She does not wear surgical gear to perform surgery. I posted photos and videos. I was comparing her to my vet who always dons proper sterile surgical attire.

Another "***." True. Bat experts have stated in books that her method is inhumane. The bats suffocate to death because the Iso is not mixed with oxygen in a nebulizer. Iso can only be used legally with a nebulizer. It is not safe to administer without a nebulizer and mask.

Another "***." I posted video of her holding a bat she stated probably has rabies in her bare hand.

One more, "***." I'm talking about attorney Randy Turner. The veterinary board is the one who told me Lollar was committing animal cruelty. Again, the truth.

It's also odd that Turner sent this proposed order to the home address of the Judge. Ya, they're not "friends." Judge is in Burleson, Texas which is public info. Judge Brigham has been retired since 1999. It appears that he doesn't use computers or the Internet.

I just received a copy of an email which Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary sent to members of the public. What she wrote is libel and defamation which I will be adding to my lawsuit against her which I filed in California Federal court. Here is my response.

I did not leave after a few days but after ten days. I was not disgruntled. I was disgusted by what I saw. I saw her possessing and giving rabies vaccinations to bats. I witnessed her trying to perform surgery on bats. I saw bats in pain and agony who later died.

The agencies did NOT find the complaints to be without merit. Health dept gave her instructions to follow which she has not followed. She told the USDA that only her vet would do open cavity surgeries from now on. She had even more problems with the health dept. More complaints were filed so she decided to leave town. She sold her building at 115 N.E. 1st St. January 2012. As per city communication the new owner gutted it and put her personal belongings on the street. As per Lollar in trial someone then reported that to the police.

There were two video cameras in the room during my deposition. The second half of the deposition recorded on the wide angle view camera was destroyed, lost, whatever. I had to file motion to compel. They filed a protective order. Judge Bonnie Sudderth ordered them to give me the video. Instantly Randy Turner said the second half was destroyed, deleted, whatever. They obviously destroyed the evidence intentionally. If there was nothing on the video, why did they destroy it?

I have never Google bombed. It's impossible to do that since 2007. Their expert Eric Shupps has no idea what he is talking about. See Wikipedia for Google bomb.Big difference between that and proper SEO.

Lollar's two vets were trained by her. They don't know any better. Her vets don't have any other bat training with true bat experts. Her one vet did not even know that it's inhumane and illegal to freeze a bat to death. He admitted he hasn't been successful pinning bat wings or using nebulizers with anesthesia. Other true trained bat vets have no problem doing this. Obviously, blind leading the blind. The one intern who testified is not a wildlife rehabilitator. That was her first experience with bats. She also doesn't know any better.

I have no history of victimizing people on the Internet. I go after stock criminals and people who abuse and neglect animals, such as Amanda Lollar. I witnessed animal cruelty. The Texas Veterinary Board told me she committed animal cruelty. I found a dead one winged bat under her desk. It'd been dead for days. That is animal neglect. One of her pallid bats was extremely malnourished and shaking. I saw her giving rabies vaccination which is a violation of the health code. I saw her trying to perform surgery on bats. Bats were dying.

If it is rare for a Judge to read a verdict immediately after the end of trial, I believe it's because the Judge was going to rule against me before I even uttered my first word in court. Judge William Brigham also over saw the temporary injunction hearing May 4, 2011. Randy Turner came up behind me and said paraphrased "I've known this Judge for years. He'll sign whatever I put in front of him." And he did. Judge William Brigham signed an overly broad temporary injunction which was void, unconstitutional, overly broad and included prior restraint. I doubt he even read it before he signed it. I saw him flip through the four pages in less than ten seconds.

At the end of her email Amanda Lollar asks people to spam the search engines. She is asking people to spread her libel and defamation far and wide. The sites she links to include libel and defamation. I am currently suing her for libel and defamation in Federal court in California. I will be adding these items to my suit.

June 27, 2012: If anyone would like a zip file of my websites, just email me. I'll send you the link or the file.

Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary and now Eric Shupps of Binarywave are libeling and defaming me. They are stating that I created a "Google Bomb" about Amanda Lollar, Bat World Sanctuary. Here is the true definition of a Google Bomb. "The terms Google bomb and Googlewashing refer to practices, such as creating large numbers of links, that cause a web page to have a high ranking for searches on unrelated or off topic keyword phrases, often for comical or satirical purposes. In contrast, search engine optimization is the practice of improving the search engine listings of web pages for relevant search terms."

Big difference between Google Bombs which are now impossible due to algorithm changes and proper search engine optimization. Eric Shupps would know that if he were a true SEO expert. Obviously he is not. Amanda Lollar on the other hand is trying to spam the search engines. Fortunately she doesn't know what she's doing.

Bat World and their other websites have cookies in them.

June 20, 2012: I took a lot of notes during the trial. Here are a few bits of information. The following three people have been complaining about Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary for years. They are Mineral Wells City Councilmember Margaret Colton. Historical Society member Carolyn Hogg. Neighbor Sharlet Evans. I do not blame these people one bit for complaining. I'm just amazed the City backed down from taking action. Every time Lollar gets in trouble she hires an Animal Rights attorney to help her. If people like a City Councilmember, Historical Society member and her neighbor are complaining, you know there is something very wrong. I was not the only person complaining.

More from the trial. I showed Amanda Lollar the email she sent to the City stating that she's sick of all the complaints against her. She's moving. She did not mention me as the reason for moving but the complaints of others. I then showed her the email where they talk about gutting her building and removing her possessions. She said "they didn't gut it. There was newer carpeting in there." I'm sure the carpeting smelled horrible and had to be removed. Then she said "someone was supposed to come and take my items but the new owner put my things on the sidewalk. Then someone called police about the items on the sidewalk." Amanda Lollar should have added herself as a defendant in this defamation law suit. Her own words are worse than mine.

I questioned Amanda Lollar about the many complaints about her over many years. She said some weren't her fault. She put up some bat boxes and guano accumulated under them. She said it wasn't her responsibility to clean them. The boxes were reported and were removed. In her website she talks about how the program was a success. No, it wasn't. I believe 98% of what's in her website is all make believe from the "successful" TNR colony to the "successful" bat boxes.

I'll be posting about portions of the trial. Amanda Lollar had three people state that she was doing a fine job with the bats. They were her vet and two interns. One intern was also a vet. Both vets said that Amanda Lollar taught them all they know about bats. That means the only things they know about bats came from Amanda Lollar. Of course they will say she is doing a fine job. They don't know any better. They have not trained with true bat experts. The other intern is not even a rehabber. She also only knows what Amanda taught her. Lollar's vet actually did not know that it's inhumane and illegal to freeze a bat to death. He admitted he's pinned bats' wings before but things didn't work out too well. True bat experts can successfully pin bones. He admitted that he hasn't had the best success using a nebulizer with anesthesia with bats. Bat experts don't have a problem doing this. The other intern vet said she'd never done an episiotomy before. Then how would she know if it's proper or not? Even then Lollar's own book says don't pull the umbilicus, cut too much or the bat could prolapse.

Here's an analogy. A mother tells her three little kids that the earth is flat. A scientist with years of study tells the public that the earth is in fact round and the mother is wrong. The mother brings her little kids who tell the public that the earth is flat. Does the testimony of the three little kids prove that the earth is actually flat and the mother is correct? No. The three little kids don't know any better because the only thing they know about the earth is from their mother who is clueless.

I looked at the report from Plaintiffs' handwriting expert again. She made three reports. The first two state the signature is only "probable," not "strongly probable" or a positive identification. The one she brought to court has no statement at all. It is only her qualifications and copies of the signatures. She was not willing to put in writing that she thought the signature was mine. Why? I believe because she knows it's not. Any lay person can just eyeball this and see the difference. Expert said because the signature on the contract is smooth, that proves it's not a forgery. The problem with that is all of my known signatures are not smooth. Someone told me earlier that a handwriting expert will give you any result you want. That definitely seems to be the case.

Someone just emailed me about Amanda Lollar being nominated for the Animal Planet animal person of the year. She basically nominated herself. She had Dottie Hyatt send in the nomination. She did not win. Is that really an honor when you nominate yourself and don't win? I can only imagine what she wrote in her own nomination.

June 19, 2012: I filed subpoenas to get info about Lollar. I have to file a notice of subpoena with her attorney. That gave him the heads up to quash the subpoenas. Knowing that he would do this I also filed information act requests to get the same info. The agencies complied. As per Fish & Wildlife Services Amanda Lollar lied in her deposition about having a FWS permit for the Indian flying fox. They are an injurious species so you need a FWS permit to comply with the Lacey Act. The government doesn't want these bats to get loose and destroy crops. Here is her import/export permit. It is not a permit to have a flying fox at Bat World. This is the only permit they could find for her. Is she possessing an injurious species without a proper Fish & Wildlife permit? She would need a permit that complies with 50 CFR 16 the Lacey Act to have an Indian flying fox.

Still from a news item.

I sent out a national press release about my appeal.

Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates Appealing Texas Court Ruling

Cummins reported Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary to authorities for alleged animal cruelty and animal neglect. She posted her reports and public documents online and was in turn sued for defamation, Bat World Sanctuary v Mary Cummins case # 352-248169-10. Substitute Judge William Brigham ruled in favor of Plaintiffs. Cummins is appealing this ruling.

"Everything I stated about Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary is 100% the truth backed up with facts and physical evidence."

Los Angeles, CA (PRWEB) June 19, 2012

Mary Cummins, a licensed wildlife rehabilitator in Los Angeles, California reported Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary in Mineral Wells, Texas for alleged animal cruelty, animal neglect and health code violations. Cummins posted her findings on her website AnimalAdvocates.us.

In Cummins' appeal she stated the items in question were results of Freedom of Information Act posted requests on her website. She posted complaints and reports made by others about Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary. ***

Cummins also stated in her appeal that she posted reports bat experts had made questioning Lollar's procedures on her website. Lollar recommended freezing bats to death in her original manual which is inhumane according to the American Veterinary Medication Association Guidelines on Euthanasia.

Judge William Brigham will soon sign an order to force Cummins to remove items from her website and others. Judge Brigham stated in court "a permanent injunction on the items Plaintiffs' 17 and 18." The items in Exhibit 17 are the results of information act requests. The order will also include Exhibit 18 which are items written by others posted on websites owned by others who were not a party to the action.

Cummins stated, "the order as stated would be overly broad. I am the only named defendant. As per Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 65 (d) the court cannot force me to remove items written by third parties on websites I don't control. It's ludicrous to think that I am being held liable for supposed defamation written and posted by others on other people's websites."

Cummins has filed an appeal, alleging that the Plaintiffs did not show the essential elements for a claim of defamation or breach of contract in court. The appeal alleges there is a conflict of interest between Plaintiffs' attorney Randy Turner of Bailey & Galyen and Judge Brigham, and that a new trial with a different Judge is in order.

On June 18, 2012 Cummins filed a motion for new trial and motion objecting to the court order. Cummins intends to appeal the decision to the Second Court of Appeals of Texas.

Cummins is currently suing Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary in Federal court in California for libel and defamation case # CV-08081 . Cummins is also suing Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary in Federal court for negligence case # CV-04902 Official complaint.

June 18, 2012: Just filed a Motion for new trial, objection to court order. Amanda Lollar just sent out some press releases about the case. Her releases are actually causing more traffic to this page and my other page. I've now been interviewed by quite a few freedom of speech people and animal lovers. I think this case will be making people take a closer look at Bat World Sanctuary.

Just saw there was a video with the Channel 33 article. Here it is. Since when is reporting someone for animal abuse and posting about it a "digital smear campaign?" This is how they try to quiet whistleblowers. Notice video of the episiotomy is in this video. That is one of the videos Amanda Lollar doesn't want anyone to see and now it's public.

Collage of stills from the video.

June 17, 2012: My website was hacked again. They didn't want me to notice so they merely deleted the complaints made by government agencies and individuals about Amanda Lollar. Also, they removed all comments on the Star Telegram article. People were posting some filthy untrue things about me. I've notified the newspaper that I will be sending a subpoena to get the identities of the posters so I can add them to my California lawsuit. I've been interviewed by a couple of freedom of speech groups. They are of course upset by the order. The order as stated would be overly broad and unenforceable.

June 16, 2012: Just spoke with a freedom of speech attorney. If the Judge signs an order ordering me to remove other people's blogs, posts, websites, it would be overly broad. "Injunctions may not be directed to non-parties in litigation." In this instance some of the non-parties are anonymous. The ones that aren't anonymous are in states other than Texas. Turner just didn't want to have to sue the real people who wrote the articles. The Judge also stated that Lollar was world renown. That makes her a public figure. Defamation would have to stand up to a higher standard.

I believe Randy Turner lied to the judge and court. I believe that is perjury. I asked him if he went into the fruit bat enclosure. First he said yes. After I asked him if he had his pre-exposure shots, he changed his story. Then he said he just looked in from the outside. That's not what this photo shows. Here's another copy for people not logged into Facebook or not friends with friends of his wife.. He's in the enclosure touching a bat. He admitted he does not have his pre-exposure card. Lollar cannot allow anyone in there with proof of vaccination. Fruit bats can also carry, get rabies. He's not even wearing gloves. His wife posted this. Bigger photo here. I've just been told that he can be disbarred for committing perjury.

I have saved the time/date stamp of the photo and photo info. It looks like perjury to me.

Perjury. Definition. "The deliberate, willful giving of false, misleading, or incomplete testimony under oath," "Criminal law, the offence committed by a witness in judicial proceedings who, having been lawfully sworn or having affirmed, wilfully gives false evidence," "deliberate or willful uttering of untruths when under oath in a court or similar tribunal." I believe attorney Randy Turner committed perjury. He willfully lied under oath. First he admitted he was in the enclosures. After I asked him if he had shots, he changed his story so he wouldn't get his client in trouble. He lied to the court. It was intentional.

I responded to the Star Telegram article here. I asked the reporter to change two items which were untrue and libelous.

1. I was never accused or convicted of "cyberstalking." I was sued for defamation and breach of contract only. Cyberstalking is a Federal crime. You just stated I committed a Federal crime. Please, remove that.

2. The videos were not "libelous." Libel is defamation that is printed. It cannot be a video. I posted the videos. They speak for themselves. Please rephrase it so it doesn't seem that the videos were libelous. The Judge never said that. No one ever said that.

3. I did not and they never proved that I used "robots to game Google." That is impossible. Google uses captcha. Robots can't get beyond captcha. See wikipedia. Their "expert" Shupps is not an expert. He's never been an expert in a court case before.

4. In court Plaintiff stated she gave human rabies vaccinations to humans. I asked her "so you gave the human rabies vaccination to Sarah Kennedy?" She said "Yes." I never said she injected it into people. She does possess the human rabies vaccination which is illegal. Only Doctors, Nurses, Pharmacists and Veterinarians may buy, receive and possess it.

5. Ms. Lollar never went to restaurants or movies before. She has always been a recluse. She never leaves her cave. She told me because people in town have hated her since 1995. I invited her out to restaurants while I was there and she said no. I saw her in court. She has not lost any weight. She has no problem making huge lies. She was crying in court. Minutes later in the hallway she's calling me names with a big smile on her face. She's a total actor.

6. All complaints were not dismissed. The Texas health dept gave her a huge list of instructions that she must follow. They told her to remove items on her website such as "bats don't carry rabies." Yes, they can carry rabies. It's irresponsible to state they don't carry rabies. She was also instructed to have people wear gloves.She did not follow their orders as you can see from her photos and videos.

7. When Bat World was being investigated, I said "they are being investigated." I dated every statement I made. The statement is still on my website but it has a date of when she was investigated.

8. The police report which I have did not state that the toddler stomped the bat. It's not in the city report or animal control report either. Lollar made that up. The incident occurred directly next door to her wild sanctuary on 115 N.E. 1st St. The toddler was at 113 N.E. 1st St. The report is in my website. That location is two blocks from Lollar's other building but is next door to where her wild bats are located. Newspaper article http://www.animaladvocates.us/batWorldLawsuit/rabidbattoddlera.jpg Lollar hired a lawyer who then threatened to sue the City if they did not find the report groundless. Here's the letter http://www.animaladvocates.us/batWorldLawsuit/Bat_World_Sanctuary_Threatens_To_Sue_City_Of_Mineral_Wells.pdf

9. I did not Google bomb. Check wiki. It's been impossible to Google bomb since 2007. They changed the algorithm.

10. Eric Shupps of Binary Wave is not an expert on authorship. He's never testified as an expert in a trial or deposition. This was the first time he used this free beta software JGAAP for a client. The author of the software stated it has limitations and should not be used in a court of law. The author stated it is a closed system. You must give it the names of possible authors then it chooses the most likely. It does not identify the true author. It cannot be used with multiple authors for a document. The samples which they stated were samples of my writing were not 100% my writing. Some were other people's articles, some included huge passages of quotes from others. A few people edited my articles. Garbage in, garbage out.

11. I stupidly told Turner that as soon as I got the video of my deposition I was going to turn my attorney in for nodding off and Turner for touching my hand. Right after I said that, that portion of the video was destroyed. If nothing happened, why did they destroy the video? Judge ordered them to give me the video. Turner instantly responded with "well, a couple of hours of the second half of the wide angle view is missing." Lollar's husband took the video. Both videos were missing huge chunks. I had to file a motion to compel, he filed a protective order. If nothing was on the video, why did he fight turning it over?

12. The video I posted of Turner clearly shows him sleeping and staring inappropriately. I sent you a link. I'm sitting to the right of my video camera. You see him follow my crotch as I sit down. He would even stare inappropriately in court. Here's an email I sent to him telling him to knock it off. http://www.animaladvocates.us/batWorldLawsuit/email_randy_turner.pdf I have a lot more video of him acting inappropriately. I have video of my attorney yawning. I'll post them.

June 15, 2012: Randy Turner called up a Texas newspaper to give them the story. He also called up channel 33, whatever that is. Amanda Lollar called Mineral Wells Index. They all called me for comment so I sent out a press release. Randy Turner has been libeling me. He said I lied and actually just sold my home for $1.1M. The new owner just sold my old home. I sold it in 2008. Turner also said that I put libel on thousands of websites. Bullshit. Amanda Lollar said she was facing financial ruin. She's making more money than ever before. Always the victim. Two peas in a pod. Egotistical, unstable, nasty individuals.

Randy Turner cried in court. He lied and told the judge I wrote "isn't it ironic that Turner's wife is on the ethics committee when Turner is so unethical." Then he cried. What an actor. Amanda Lollar is also a total actor. She turned on the water works and shed some crocodile tears. Immediately after her sob fest I see her in the hallway. She calls me names and taunts me mean girl style along with her posse. Then her husband Larry Crittenden says "how does it feel to get your ass whipped by a ninth grader." One, I'm appealing with good cause. Two, I have two lawsuits against Lollar. Three, even if I lose my appeal they can never get anything out of me, can never remove the main websites.

So far I've spoken with three lawyers and a judge. They all said this is just Texas good ole boy. I should have won the case. I'll post my motion for new trial, appeal tomorrow.

Press release about the case.

Mary Cummins appealing unjust Texas court ruling

June 14, 2012 Judge William Brigham ruled in favor of Plaintiffs in the case Bat World Sanctuary v Mary Cummins case # 352-248169-10. Cummins had reported Lollar to authorities for animal cruelty and animal neglect which she witnessed while at Bat World in Texas. She posted her reports and public documents online and was sued for defamation. Cummins is appealing this unjust ruling.

Mary Cummins an animal rescuer in Los Angeles, California reported Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary for animal cruelty, animal neglect and health code violations. Cummins witnessed Amanda Lollar performing surgery on bats when she is not a veterinarian and hasn't gone past the ninth grade. Bats were dying under Lollar's care. Cummins posted her findings on her website AnimalAdvocates.us.

Cummins also posted the results of Freedom of Information Act requests on her website. She posted complaints and reports made by others about Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary. ***

Cummins also posted negative reports bat experts had made about Lollar's procedures. Lollar recommended freezing bats to death in her manual which is illegal and inhumane according to the American Veterinary Medication Association. Lollar also recommended the improper use of anesthesia which Lollar admitted caused some bats to die.

Amanda Lollar then sued Cummins for defamation. Plaintiffs in court did not prove that Cummins defamed Lollar. The essential elements of a defamation cause of action that must be proven in Texas are, (1) The defendant published a statement of fact, (2) The statement was defamatory, (3) The statement was false, (4) The defendant acted negligently in publishing the false and defamatory statement, and (5) The Plaintiffs suffered damages as a result.

Plaintiffs did not prove that Cummins made all of the statements. Most of the items were the results of information act requests. They were public documents written by others. Cummins contends that everything she posted was the absolute truth. Plaintiffs did not prove that the items were false or that they suffered any financial damages.

Cummins was also sued for breach of contract. The essential elements of a breach of contract cause of action that must be proven are, (1) There is a valid contract; (2) The Plaintiffs performed or tendered performance according to the terms of the contract; (3) The Defendant breached the contract; and (4) The Plaintiffs sustained damages as a result of the breach.

Cummins contends she never signed a contract. Plaintiffs' own signature expert report stated that the signature on the contract was only "probable." It was not "strongly probable" or a "positive identification." Plaintiffs did not perform according to the contract. Cummins actions would have never been considered a breach. Plaintiffs showed no financial damages.

Even though Plaintiffs did not prove defamation or breach of contract Judge William Brigham ruled in favor of Plaintiffs. The Judge will soon sign an order to force Cummins to remove items from her website and others. The items are the results of information act requests. They are complaints made by others about animal cruelty, animal neglect and violations of the health code. The order will also include websites owned by others who were not a party to the action.

Cummins stated "I clearly did not defame Amanda Lollar or Bat World Sanctuary. I reported her for animal cruelty and neglect. I provided photos and videos to authorities besides detailed reports. I believe Lollar just wants to hide these complaints from the public. Most of the items they want removed were written by others or are on websites I don't even control. I cannot possibly remove other people's websites or content. This order is overly broad."

Cummins continued "I most certainly did not sign their contract. Their own expert handwriting report did not state that I signed it. The authorship report by their so-called 'expert' Eric Shupps is also flawed. Shupps has never been an expert witness before in any case. He used a free beta software called JGAAP. The author of the program stated it cannot be used for court cases because of its inherent limitations. Shupps also used the writings of others as samples of my writing. Garbage in, garbage out. On top of this Shupps accused me of planting a Google bomb. Google bombs have been impossible since 2007."

When asked about the ruling Cummins replied, "I'm shocked because Plaintiffs did not show the essential elements for a claim of defamation or breach of contract. Then again I'm not shocked. Before one hearing Plaintiffs' attorney Randy Turner told me that he's known this judge for years. He insinuated that the Judge will automatically rule in his favor, and he did. There was a conflict of interest."

Cummins stated she is contesting the Judge's order, requesting a new trial and appealing the decision. Cummins is currently suing Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary in Federal court in California for libel and defamation case # CV-08081.

June 15, 2012: Got back from Texas last night. Judge Bonnie Sudderth was supposed to hear this trial. I show up and see Judge William Brigham come out of the door and I knew I would lose. Texas attorney Randy Turner told me before the temporary injunction hearing over which Brigham also presided "I've known this Judge for years. He'll sign anything I put in front of him." Judge Brigham then signed an overly broad void unenforceable injunction. Judge Bonnie Sudderth said she would never force me to remove posts I did not make on websites I don't control. I lost the case today. I just wrote a press release. I was told the Judge supervisor also a male Judge swapped out Sudderth for Brigham. I'm sure Turner and Brigham were behind this.

June 8, 2012: I was searching for Amanda Lollar and Bat Word Sanctuary's assets. I also searched for the assets of her husband Larry Crittenden and BWS board of directors. They are all liable for Lollar's actions financially and legally. I found some interesting things here. Seems 115 N.E. 1st St also includes 117 N.E. 1st St. There is also a property in Bosque, Texas which looks like the site for the Bat Castle as per Google satellite image. I intend to collect whatever judgment I receive in this case and the other cases.

Amanda Lollar keeps libeling me. She just posted this, "Bat World Sanctuary Thank you for your wonderful comments everyone! You are all fantastic. I should add that the claims of our building being "gutted," that my "personal belongings" were "removed", that we were evicted and chased out of town by the health department are completely fabricated by our harasser. The bottom part of the building is being remodeled by a new occupant and what was being carried out were garage sale items that we donated to a church. We were never contacted by the heath department or any city officials. All of the bats (and Norbert) are completely safe and sound just like they always have been. We will keep you posted as the trial progresses, that's a promise!"

That is not the truth. Amanda Lollar stated that my claims to the health dept caused her to leave town. The health dept has complained about her for YEARS! The City has written up the building numerous times. The building was gutted and cleaned by the new owner. Her personal belongings were removed as per the City Manager. I never said she was evicted. She sold the building. She was indeed contacted by the health dept and city officials many times. Norbert lives behind the building on Oak, not the one on 1st St. Delusional!

June 6, 2012: Here are the emails about Amanda Lollar being forced out of town and her building had to be gutted. Here are the emails. If the building was so bad that it had to be gutted, why didn't Texas Parks and Wildlife Department do something about it? There were 30,000-50,000 bats in there. Seems one of the people who complained was directly next door at 113. She runs an art gallery. I can't imagine how horrible that must have been next to the smelly sanctuary. Plus, that is where the toddler was bitten by a rabid bat. I doubt the gallery owner wants her patrons to get rabies just from visiting her store. Thank you, gallery owner for reporting her.

I just received more results of subpoenas and information act requests. This is a doozy! I contacted an attorney in Los Angeles from CAPS. She is a friend of a friend of mine. Turner was listed as an attorney for CAPS. The attorney stated he was not counsel for CAPS and he shouldn't put that on his resume. Anyway, I sent her some emails about my case asking for help. What did she do? She violated the attorney/client privilege and sent them to Randy Turner whom she knew was opposing counsel. She also libeled me in her forward. What did Randy Turner do? He forwarded that email to his friends. My email stated that Turner's client is not what she appears to be which is the truth. Turner somehow interpreted that to mean that I'm dangerous? He emails his friends paraphrased "If I am found in the Trinity River, you know where to start the investigation." Anyway for unknown reasons Turner forwards this to Amanda Lollar and others including attorney Donald Feare. Lollar then forwards it to Mineral Wells police stating because of this email she fears me. WTH?! I will be reporting the Los Angeles lawyer to the bar for violation of the attorney/client privilege by sharing my email. I emailed the attorney the truth of the matter of my case and she shared it with opposing counsel. Can't get any lower than that. On top of this the female attorney sent me some truly bizarre and rambling emails about her ex-husband to which I of course never responded.

I filed the following documents with the court. I did not post this until after trial was over. Defendant's trial brief, Defendant's witness list, and Defendant's motion for malicious prosecution and abuse of process. Finishing up my preparations for trial. My trial notebook, exhibits, witnesses are ready.

January 5, 2012: Bat World Sanctuary was just "recognized" by American Sanctuary Assocition here. This is obviously one of those accreditations you just buy like being a Super Lawyer or a Power Attorney. BWS doesn't even meet the standards.***I looked at other members of this group. They give tours of sanctuary animals. That's also against their standards. Being accredited by this group would be a negative thing, not a positive thing. ***

Amanda Lollar maybe sold the property at 115 N.E. 1st St. January 4, 2012. She left her items in the building so the new owner tossed them out. The property is valued at $39,250. That would mean she sold it at a loss? This is fishy. A local developer named Michael Rusher who is on the City council bought it.Here's the document.

June 2, 2012: I searched real estate records for the 115 N.E. 1st building. Here is the result. BATS sold the building to Bat World Sanctuary October 2011 for $56K taking out a new $45K loan. 80% loan due in four years. Supposedly it's an arm's length transaction meaning the two parties buyer and seller are not related. The price should be market value. I believe this also proves that Amanda Lollar did not tell the truth in her depo. I asked her if BATS owned the building. She said that Bat World Sanctuary owned it. They transferred it. As per this doc they didn't do that until recently.

BATS bought the building in 1992. Lollar transferred it in 1997 with a value of $14,000 or so. I've requested underlying documents but do not have them as yet so this is my personal belief at the moment. She just transferred it to BWS 10/2011 for $56K. That means there was a profit of $42K. Did BATS or Amanda Lollar take the profit? It most certainly was not an arm's length transaction. Something is fishy here. I have a feeling Lollar is trying to hide money and assets because of my two lawsuits against her and I may win her lawsuit against me.

Possibly more forgery by Amanda Lollar. In her supposed police report against me she told the police I sent threatening emails and letters. I only threatened to sue her in email. I never sent her a letter ever. Did she forge documents to make it look like I threatened her? The report states "due to the content of the emails and letters, she is afraid of Ms. Cummins." She is obviously making up a story. Plus, I can barely afford to fly to Texas for hearings. I can't afford to fly to Texas to harass her in person.

June 1, 2012: Seems Amanda Lollar and Bat World Sanctuary are again in trouble with the City of Mineral Wells. People were complaining about all the guano under her building. She told the City that she is moving out of both buildings in one to two years. She says "I can no longer run a world class organization with the constant distractions of having to defend our work protecting the environment and the bats. The burden has just become too overwhelming." "World class organization?" Her work protecting the environment? Her building is a public nuisance, threat to public safety and it smells horrible! Delusional?

Amanda Lollar claims everyone who visited Bat World when I was there gave her proof of immunization. I didn't give her proof. Neither did other interns. Lying to government officials again. End of 2011 Amanda Lollar claims she excluded bats from the building at 115 N. E. 1st St. January 2012 Someone gutted the "wild sanctuary" building. They are removing Lollar's possessions from the building. I will call and see if the building was sold or if she was foreclosed upon. She took money out of the building December 2011.

This is funny. Supposedly attorney Randy Turner told Amanda Lollar to call the police on me! The police went to Lollar's house in Mineral Wells, Texas. Lollar stated I was harassing her and posting about her. She wanted them to enforce the injunction! I doubt her attorney told her to call police. She asked the police to do something about it. They didn't investigate or do anything about it. I'm in California. The websites are in California. I am posting the truth. The police did accidentally give me Lollar's social security number and driver's license number along with her DOB, height and weight. They should have redacted that. I even told them to redact any personal or confidential info. I will make sure this document doesn't even up in any court docs.

In Federal court in CA today Judge Dolly M. Gee stated that Defendants name calling was paraphrased "childish, juvenile, something a five year old would do." She looked at Lollar's attorney and said this should be settled in mediation by an adult. I cannot get an injunction on John Does in Federal court. I have to list their names. I will refile on the John Does. The person I name and sue must also legally control the website in question. For all these reasons Bat World never should have gotten the first injunction against me. At most they could have asked that I remove what I control. Judge William Brigham was wrong. Lollar's CA attorney stated they have and will remove libelous posts, comments Lollar made. Lollar lied to her attorney. He said I was only at Bat World 4-7 days. I was there ten days. He said the authorities cleared her of all wrong doing. Definitely not true. Judge took it under submission.

While I was in Federal court I listened to a case on copyright infringement. Guy was trying to claim copyright to a series of yoga poses. Judge and other side said you can't copyright a process or yoga pose. Plus, the other side gave them permission to use the positions. Sound familiar? Judge Gee was great. She said with a smile "You can't expect me to set case precedent for yoga positions to be copyrighted or patented." Crazy someone would even try to do that.

May 28, 2012: Called up ACLU Texas again asking for last minute help. They said I seem to be doing a fine job by myself. They told me to be sure to tell them the outcome of the case. Why am I even a member?

Just found this review of Judge Bonnie Sudderth. This looks promising. Here it is. To those saying I won't receive a fair shake in Texas, you may be wrong. I believe lawyers at the Tarrant County Bar Association made these reviews.

A friend just pointed out that the Judge was reviewed by Texas lawyers who are members of the Tarrant County Bar Association. While she was fair, just and attentive to Texas lawyers, that doesn't necessarily mean she will treat me a non-native pro se the same way. So far she seems to be fair and just. Nothing I can do about it now.

May 23, 2012: Was just at my mail box. Picked up the Judge's order on Motion for Summary Judgment. There is no explanation in there. It just says denied. Also got notice of trial set for June 11. I believe we go first but I see another case there. I'm assuming June 11-15. I already booked my flight for those days and have readied my witnesses. Judge Bonnie Sudderth did not send an order on the two motions to amend the temporary injunction. Perhaps she won't write an order on those motions and will wait until trial. She didn't send in orders for the other motions she ruled on. I don't really think there's a need. Her rulings are in the minutes. Written orders aren't needed.

Was reading a great book on bats. Just realized that Amanda Lollar does not have the biggest bat sanctuary of any kind in the world. The Memphis Zoo has a bat sanctuary with over 400 bats. They even have a breeding colony in there. Amanda Lollar can't say she has the largest bat sanctuary in the world any more. She also can't say she is the only one who has a breeding colony. This breeding colony started in 1995. I'm sure Amanda Lollar knows about this sanctuary. They have unreleasable bats in there.

Results coming in from my subpoenas. Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary gave me a supposed email she supposedly sent to Nicole Carion of CA Fish & Game about me. Turns out Amanda Lollar never sent that email to Nicole Carion as per Nicole Carion and the results of my subpoena. Did Amanda Lollar just forge yet another document? Sure seems so. Lollar has no shame at all. On top of this Lollar gave to me in discovery in my CA case some text from the email. It doesn't even match the text from the supposed forged email. She swears in her depo she sent one email to CADFG about me. She even said that her attorney told her to send the email to Fish & Game,i.e. "On the advice of legal council (sic)." I highly doubt Randy Turner would tell his client to send a defamatory email to Fish & Game about me. One, it's defamation. Two, it has nothing to do with the case in Texas. Amanda Lollar is just a petty, juvenile, vindictive person.

I was just comparing the supposed email to other emails to/from Amanda Lollar. Sig file spacing is off. The item they gave me was a .doc file. If she just printed the email out it would have been a paper file or pdf. A doc file most likely means she edited it. I can clearly tell she did not print it from her email program. All of the emails I gave to her were printed out of my email programs. Amanda Lollar previously forged an email to me. It was an obvious forgery. She was caught forging a contract in the Talking Talons case because she got cocky. She put the current logo on the document instead of the one they had when the document was supposedly signed years earlier.

May 22, 2012: Amanda Lollar of Bat World Sanctuary sells her how to rehab bat manual, the pdf version and the printed one. I don't sell my manuals, neither do others. We offer them for free to help wildlife and wildlife rehabilitators. I asked for permission to post these free manuals online. I only wrote the tree squirrel, ground squirrel and skunk manuals.Link to free manuals.

May 17, 2012: I just went through the temporary injunction again to make sure I wasn't violating it. I have not reposted any of the photos or videos. I have not posted content from the pages which were deleted. This one is a little hard to tell or prove because the pages are gone. They were taken down before I even saw what was in the pages. I have not posted any techniques developed by Bat World Sanctuary. Most of the "techniques" that are in her book were actually developed by others. Remember she likes to take credit for the "port-a-bug" which was developed by someone else. She also likes to take credit for euthanizing bats with Iso. Bat people were doing that years before Amanda Lollar had even seen a bat. Many manuals existed before her first 1994 manual which gives bad advice. Her vet is credited in the manual which recommends freezing bats to death. Blind leading the blind. He's a vet and should have known better.

May 16, 2012: In court on May 10, 2012 Texas attorney Randy Turner stated that he never threatened to sue any websites. He of course lied. I realize he's not under oath but I would think he must tell the truth to Judge Bonnie Sudderth. This is from a response from ACLU-NC to Randall Turner, "It has come to our attention that you have sent a demand to Indybay that it remove a webpage from it's website" " and have threated to add Indybay as a defendant in your lawsuit against Ms. Mary Cummins if it does not immediately comply. Indybay will not remove these materials." ACLU-NC and Indybay said NO! They were one of the few websites which refused to be bullied by Turner's idle threats. Notice, he did not add them as a defendant.

Was just told that some Judges never grant a motion for summary judgment. Others hand them out like Halloween candy. It's possible I lost just because this Judge never grants them. I was also told that the other side only has to show one piece of evidence to win the summary judgment. Plaintiff showed that in one part of one deposition Plaintiff stated they never gave the rabies vaccination to a person. Of course she'd previously stated that she did. She did indeed give the rabies vaccination to Sarah Kennedy aka wingedsonar. When I say "give" I don't mean "inject.